adrianbrink

Fixed global consensus is a feature of the past.

@anoma's fractal instances adapt consensus on-demand.

They give you apps that are local when you need speed, and global when you need reach.

Infrastructure should adapt to real users.

This is the way.

Doesn't matter the chain: Anoma is the end game.

Gen 1: Bitcoin: Rigid, monolthic, minimally scriptable architecture

Gen 2: Ethereum: More programmable but still limited, transaction-centric settlements

Gen 3: @anoma: Freeform, modular, declarative and intent-centric and programmability

Intent Machines > Virtual Machines

Instead of signing step-by-step transactions you don't understand, authorize the outcome you want.

@anoma's declarative programming puts users back in control of their on-chain interactions.

end the app/chain suicide pact.

@anoma decouples the fate of apps from the chain they're built on.

so you don't have to worry about a decision you made on testnet 18 months ago dooming you from the start.

friends don't let friends build chain-dependent apps.

spread the word.

If your L2 is essentially a centralized sequencer, you're playing web2 games with extra steps.

@Anoma allows you to build fully decentralized systems without sacrificing speed or user experience.

Stop acting like centralization has to be sacrificed to get results.

Web3 gaming should be like a World of Warcraft dungeon crawl.

WoW has a global environment, but enter a dungeon, and it creates a separate, local instance for a small group of players.

Anoma allows for local gaming that can then settle to whatever global chain you choose.

The most important choice you make as a developer should be what kind of app you want to build ...

... not what specific chain you're going to build on.

The 3 things I look for in assessing projects to build on @anoma:

1. Novel ideas ... not clones of apps from other chains.

2. Chain agnosticism ... picking a chain before an idea has always seemed backward to me.

3. A background, or focus, on UX ... we did all the infrastructure plumbing for you, so your team should be focused on creating a user-first experience.

If this is you, comment or DM me.

I'll just say it: web3 gaming should be local.

Global consensus latency is too slow — people playing games in Seoul shouldn't wait for validators in London or San Francisco.

@Anoma allows for local instances that can then settle back to a global chain.

Blockchains today force everyone into a single consensus domain.

It's like forcing every website in the world to run on a single server.

This creates unnecessary latency, costs, and vulnerabilities.

When one part breaks, everything breaks.

That's why Anoma introduces sovereign instances … 🧵

Do I understand Hyperliquid correctly in that it's running a fully custodial centralized exchange without KYC like the early Binance days?

No wonder it's printing money! That's the early Binance reg arb!

We're entering a multi-polar world.

ETH and SOL are like the USD-dominant world of the past.

The future is more complicated. Dominance fades. The US-China trade deal is an example.

And in a multi-polar world, flexible intents-based architecture wins over the monoliths.

I've never understood the preciousness about coding languages.

A good engineer can learn Rust, Solidity, or Juvix in weeks.

If you're chain-dependent because of language fear, you're optimizing for the wrong thing.