By Blessing Mene
Across Africa, agritech is faltering – not with a bang, but with silence. And yet, amid the pitch decks, panel discussions, and rising user numbers, few in the ecosystem are sounding the alarm.
But we need to.
The truth is: African agritech is copying fintech models, chasing vanity metrics, and building impressive technology that farmers barely use. This isn’t just a funding concern – it’s a fundamental business model crisis.
1.) Agritech Is Not Fintech – And That’s Okay
Fintech thrives on volume. Millions of microtransactions mean even a 0.5% transaction fee can generate significant revenue.
Agritech? Not the same.
An agrifinancing platform might process 3,000 transactions in a month, and a commodity aggregator may close 15 large contracts over the same period. Copy-pasting fintech’s pricing model simply doesn’t work. Agritech success is margin-driven, not volume-driven.
We must stop pretending. Pricing should reflect value delivered, not mimic app-based platforms with daily user interactions.
Ironically, Coca-Cola remains one of Africa’s most profitable agri-distribution models. They don’t grow crops – but they move sugar-based products with unmatched efficiency. Agritechs would do well to borrow that playbook: logistics, branding, smart pricing, and mass distribution.
How Opera’s @minipay is Serving as a Distribution Channel for African Blockchain Startups – https://t.co/IQ5wwFBx5e
— Africa Tech Summit – Accra 24-25th Sep (@AfricaTechSMT) April 14, 2025
2.) User Numbers Are Up – But Revenues Are Missing
Every week, startups tout big user bases:
“100,000 farmers onboarded.” “500,000 downloads.”
But if each user paid just $10 per month, that should equate to millions in revenue. So where is it?
The answer: many of those users aren’t paying customers. They were onboarded through donor subsidies, free pilots, or simply represent dormant accounts.
Meanwhile, real-world agri-businesses – cassava processors in Ogun, feed millers in Accra – may have just 80 customers. But they operate profitably. They focus on unit economics, inventory turnover, and cash flow — not vanity dashboards.
If your platform claims impact, your books should show income. Otherwise, it’s not a business. It’s a grant project.
FUNDING | Human Rights Foundation Grants 1 Billion Satoshis (10 $BTC) to Support 23 Global #Bitcoin Projects – 4 Are African Projects
Spanning Latin America, Africa, and Asia, the latest cohort of recipients includes initiatives that build tools, foster education, and expand… pic.twitter.com/N89T2eP2i9
— BitKE (@BitcoinKE) April 4, 2025
3.) We’re Building Tech That No One Uses
We’ve become obsessed with building: AI dashboards. IoT tools. Mobile apps.
But ask farmers, and they’ll tell you what matters:
Fertilizer that arrives on time
Buyers who actually pay
Working capital that’s fair
A human being to call when things go wrong
These aren’t novel problems – they’re the essential ones. And if the solutions we’re building aren’t addressing them, then we’re not solving for the user. We’re building for the funder.
Until we return to real problems, real unit economics, and real value creation, the sector will continue to quietly collapse — no matter how many farmers are “onboarded.”
[TECH] Kenya’s Blockchain-based Agritech Startup, FarmShine, Raises $250, 000 in Funding: FarmShine, a Kenyan Agritech startup that connects farmers with information and suppliers, has raised $250, 000 (KE.. https://t.co/GYK3WYEnz1 via @BitcoinKE
— Top Kenyan Blogs (@Blogs_Kenya) December 6, 2019
Edited by BitKE. The original post was published here.
Stay tuned to BitKE for deeper insights into the African startup space.
Join our WhatsApp channel here.
Follow us on X for the latest posts and updates
Join and interact with our Telegram community
_________________________________________
