Looking at Base onchain vs Sol here - some clear outliers sh | game_for_one på Binance Square

Populära artiklar

Bokmärk och gillad

--

Looking at Base onchain vs Sol here - some clear outliers showing up. Given the nature of buyers and participants, Base likely offers better r-r on this dip.

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

SOL

134,28

-0.98%

0

0

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

@game_for_one

Utforska mer från Creator

Even Labubu is holding on better than ETH

--

Looking at Base onchain vs Sol here - some clear outliers showing up. Given the nature of buyers and participants, Base likely offers better r-r on this dip if you are scalping.

--

Many don’t like to hear this but if you’re lightly exposed and holding small positions you’re not confident in, just staring at the chart hoping for a lucky exit, it’s often better to close them out and go fully flat for a bit. 1) Clears your mental slate. Weak positions clog your thinking and anchor your bias. 2) Breaks the sunk cost loop. Just because you bought doesn’t mean you need to hold. Flat isn’t passive, it’s a position. It resets your conviction and puts you back in control.

--

I often get asked why I pick or look at specific "utility" plays over others. What I’ve found and what’s consistently held true in this space especially as of late is that the best plays, for me and for many others, aren’t just about the tech. I’m looking for belief systems with liquidity. The best-performing "utility" plays in crypto aren’t the ones with the best code. They’re the ones that build cults fast. Tech is secondary. The real product is the story. Humans think in narrative. We want to belong, signal status, and feel early. Crypto just wraps that up in a token and gives it a price. Every top utility play follows the same structure: - A sticky story that midwits can repeat - A visible leader either a loud founder or "trustworthy" KOLs (ones with past experience) - A status game around being early and being right KTA worked because the voices behind it made it feel inevitable. ai16z and Kled worked (at least early on) because the founders understood crypto attention - they were outspoken, constantly online, and knew how to shape narrative. And when these types of plays fail, it’s rarely the tech that breaks. It’s the belief that breaks. So when scanning for plays a good set of things to ask: 1) Does this have a narrative people want to believe? 2) Is there someone loud enough to anchor the story? 3) Is there social payoff for being early and loud? If the answers are yes, that’s where flows go. People don’t buy "tech". They buy narrative, plus faith that the tech eventually lands. And they hold because selling means quitting the tribe. Utility matters but only as long as there’s a story, a preacher, and a crowd convinced the code will get there.

--

Many of you would do better in this environment by dropping the topblasting mindset that often ends in emotional exits when conditions don’t follow through. Instead, focus on accumulating quality projects with committed teams at the right spots, where the swing potential actually exists.

--

Senaste nytt

Crypto Kidnapping Incident in France Highlights Rising Threats

--

Elon Musk's xAI Plans to Retrain Grok Model with Revised Knowledge Base

--

Bitcoin(BTC) Surpasses 102,000 USDT with a Narrowed 0.81% Decrease in 24 Hours

--

Bitcoin Supply Shortage Confirmed as Companies Increase Holdings

--

Cryptocurrency Derivatives Risk Index Remains Stable

--

Cookie-inställningar

Plattformens villkor

Plattformens villkor

Cookie-inställningar