Start
Avisering
Profil
Populära artiklar
Nyheter
Bokmärk och gillad
Historik
Kreatörcenter
Inställningar
danrobinson
--
Följ
The deeper you get into DEX design, the sillier it feels to be dogmatic about any of it
Everything depends on fiddly microstructure details
Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll.
Se användarvillkor.
88
0
Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna
⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto
💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer
👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig
E-post/telefonnummer
Registrera dig
Inloggning
Relevant kreatör
danrobinson
@danrobinson
Följ
Utforska mer från Creator
Trying to get o3 to write a paper for me and it got stuck on a pretty basic misunderstanding of AMMs and path dependency So we're now 10 messages deep into an argument about it Incredibly addictive, this will replace Twitter
--
Is there any way to do an onchain prediction market for p(doom)? Given the impossibility of settlement in the apocalypse and the difficulty of credit in the non-apocalypse case
--
“Don’t use chains with centralized sequencers, since someday they might subtly extract value from you Instead use decentralized sequencers that are guaranteed to extract maximum value from you, today”
--
I don’t think whether a sequencer is decentralized matters too much What matters most is what rules they follow, and particularly whether they use their power to hurt users or extract value You can have extractive decentralized sequencers, or nonextractive centralized ones
--
Any researchers at Solana Accelerate who want to meet up? DMs are open
--
Senaste nytt
U.S. Senate Prepares Market Structure Legislation for September Completion
--
Bitwise Revises ETF Filing for DOGE and Aptos
--
U.S. Senate to Review Crypto Market Structure Bill Draft
--
PayPal CEO Discusses Stablecoin Use Cases
--
Insider Increases Short Positions in ETH and BTC
--
Visa mer
Webbplatskarta
Cookie-inställningar
Plattformens villkor