Thanks to CLOBs people are finally realizing that we need 10 | nickwh8te på Binance Square

Populära artiklar

Bokmärk och gillad

--

Thanks to CLOBs people are finally realizing that we need 100MB/s+ of DA, but this is just the beginning..
This same thing will happen to every app that finds pmf. Usage will explode and apps will absolutely EAT blockspace
CLOBs on blobs
Everything on blobs

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

11

0

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

@nickwh8te

Utforska mer från Creator

Whoever invented the Metam*sk sign in pop up reminder should be fired

--

Pretty interesting reply thread btw @sam_battenally and @aeyakovenko about latency vs validator distro/MCP. Here's the thinking: If you want to minimize your round trip time (RTT) you need to geographically colocate your node with a proposer. In a single sequencer or geo-concentrated validator setup, this is trivial and extremely fast since you just colocate with the sequencer/validators and you're done. In a geo-distributed single leader setup your average RTT would be the average stake-weighted RTT between all validators, which would end up being pretty slow no matter where you are. But with MCP you could get consistently low RTTs by colocating in an area where there is a concentration of validators & stakeweight such that you have a high likelihood of there being at least one proposer there per slot. This seems to get you the best of both worlds: geographically decentralized validators, good CR, low latency. However I'm still confused how conflicting txs confirmed by two different proposers in MCP get resolved. It seems that the guarantee that you get from a proposer in MCP is fundamentally different from what a single sequencer or single leader gives you.

--

Why Celestia will win as DA for CLOBs: → enough DA throughput to support CLOBs and consistently ships scaling upgrades on schedule (21.33MB/s on mamo-1 testnet) → the most secure with ~$1B slashable stake, data availability sampling support, and blobstream for bridging (there will be a lot of funds at risk) → the most reliable/battle tested alt-DA with the most users in prod (any downtime would be devastating for a CLOB) → the best brand, best DevEx, most integrations, and strongest ecosystem support out there ... and the competition is not even close CLOBs are coming for Celestia's blobs 🦣

--

Celestia looking good here

--

No one wants more rollups, they want more apps. But it just so happens that rollups are the most powerful way to build apps.

--

Senaste nytt

Strategy's Bitcoin Tracker Update Sparks Speculation on Holdings

--

Bitcoin Traders Anticipate Continued Bull Market

--

Bitcoin Adoption in Corporate Treasury Sparks Debate Among Industry Leaders

--

Ripple and SEC Seek Settlement in Ongoing Legal Battle

--

Joseph Robin Discusses Ethereum Amid Improved U.S. Regulatory Environment

--

Cookie-inställningar

Plattformens villkor

Plattformens villkor

Cookie-inställningar