x --> polymarket robinhood --> bitstamp stripe --> privy (a | divine_economy på Binance Square

Populära artiklar

Bokmärk och gillad

--

x --> polymarketrobinhood --> bitstamp
stripe --> privy
(all from last week)
it's not necessarily a bad thing, but should be clear by this point the future of web3... is web2

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

1

0

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

@divine_economy

Utforska mer från Creator

x --> polymarket robinhood --> bitstamp stripe --> privy the future of web3 is web2

--

You can now day trade the internet... literally. @UpsideFun is backed by Jason Choi, Arthur Hayes, and 25+ other degenerate angel investors. Steal my Invite Code to get in before anyone else: SCIM0G8

--

little horse race visualizations of which chains go fastest are cool but you know what's cooler visualizations of which chains have good apps

--

it honestly makes perfect sense that ct has gone from hating on tradfi (2017) to VCs (2021) to crypto founders themselves (2025). look around. nearly every found is playing opposite sides in a game, telling VCs how they'll make money from users, and telling users how they'll make money from VC funding. when you tell users you're giving them value, and then tell VCs that they can extract that value from users, nobody is going to trust you. because to-date, there have largely been two types of founders. on the one side, there are the ones who genuinely care about users, and then have to figure out a narrative to sell it to VCs. and on the other, there are the ones who just want to max token value, and then have to figure out a narrative to sell it to users. the real issue here isn't the founders forced to play this game. the issue is that this became a game in the first place because token value and utility diverged in such opposite directions. the high-priced tokens have typically benefitted from mimetics, being compared to other products in their category, rather than any intrinsic value. it's gotten to the point that if something is useful, it tends to be worth *less* because it can be valued. but we also have to understand that the game is changing—rapidly. the actual winning products and tokens from the past year are the ones that can actually generate revenue. users are so used to having that subsidized by VCs that they call it "extraction"; it feels inconceivable to ct that people would pay for something they like because, well, that's never really been the case in crypto. but it is the case now. and it means there are exciting things that can be built, that can generate revenue, and that can maybe, just maybe, be fun and interesting and valuable enough that users will actually spend money on them. which is to say that there is a solution here. and the solution is apps.

--

polymarket lets you long the vibes. pumpfun lets you long the vibes. hyperliquid lets you long the vibes. the winning crypto apps are the ones that let you—let me see if i can put this properly, ahem— long the vibes.

--

Senaste nytt

Stripe's Acquisition of Privy Signals Shift Towards Digital Assets

--

U.S. Debt Ceiling Deadline Approaches This Summer

--

U.S. Senator Advocates for Mainstream Adoption of Cryptocurrency

--

Brian Quintenz Faces Senate Scrutiny Over CFTC Nomination and Crypto Regulation

--

Bitcoin Price News: Bitcoin Price Eyes $150K After Hitting $110K; Analysts See $1M Target Possible

--

Cookie-inställningar

Plattformens villkor

Plattformens villkor

Cookie-inställningar