Start
Avisering
Profil
Populära artiklar
Nyheter
Bokmärk och gillad
Historik
Kreatörcenter
Inställningar
divine_economy
--
Följ
we really underestimate crypto’s ability to bring people together
for the first and only time ever, andrew tate is relatable to me
Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll.
Se användarvillkor.
ETH
2 810,31
+6.16%
115
0
Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna
⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto
💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer
👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig
E-post/telefonnummer
Registrera dig
Inloggning
Relevant kreatör
divine_economy
@divine_economy
Följ
Utforska mer från Creator
it honestly makes perfect sense that ct has gone from hating on tradfi (2017) to VCs (2021) to crypto founders themselves (2025). look around. nearly every found is playing opposite sides in a game, telling VCs how they'll make money from users, and telling users how they'll make money from VC funding. when you tell users you're giving them value, and then tell VCs that they can extract that value from users, nobody is going to trust you. because to-date, there have largely been two types of founders. on the one side, there are the ones who genuinely care about users, and then have to figure out a narrative to sell it to VCs. and on the other, there are the ones who just want to max token value, and then have to figure out a narrative to sell it to users. the real issue here isn't the founders forced to play this game. the issue is that this became a game in the first place because token value and utility diverged in such opposite directions. the high-priced tokens have typically benefitted from mimetics, being compared to other products in their category, rather than any intrinsic value. it's gotten to the point that if something is useful, it tends to be worth *less* because it can be valued. but we also have to understand that the game is changing—rapidly. the actual winning products and tokens from the past year are the ones that can actually generate revenue. users are so used to having that subsidized by VCs that they call it "extraction"; it feels inconceivable to ct that people would pay for something they like because, well, that's never really been the case in crypto. but it is the case now. and it means there are exciting things that can be built, that can generate revenue, and that can maybe, just maybe, be fun and interesting and valuable enough that users will actually spend money on them. which is to say that there is a solution here. and the solution is apps.
--
polymarket lets you long the vibes. pumpfun lets you long the vibes. hyperliquid lets you long the vibes. the winning crypto apps are the ones that let you—let me see if i can put this properly, ahem— long the vibes.
--
the three keys to successful go-to-market are not about a product people like. the three keys to successful go-to-market are fomo, tribalism, and rewards. crypto has mastered this art the key to *retention* is building a product people like. and this is an art crypto is learning
--
crypto is just the sum of two cultural trends: the financialization of everything and the vibeification of everything everything that wins—bitcoin as vibemoney, memecoins as vibegambling, prediction markets as vibebets—is where they meet people just want to long the vibes.
--
crypto is just the sum of two cultural: the financialization of everything and the vibeification of everything everything that wins—bitcoin as vibemoney, memecoins as vibegambling, prediction markets as vibebets—is the product of both people just want to long the vibes.
--
Senaste nytt
White House Denies Reports on Treasury Secretary as Fed Chair Candidate
--
Russia and U.S. to Shift Diplomatic Talks to Moscow
--
SEC Requests Revised Solana ETF Filings Amid Approval Speculations
--
BNB Surpasses 670 USDT with a 1.34% Increase in 24 Hours
--
Ethereum(ETH) Surpasses 2,800 USDT with a 8.48% Increase in 24 Hours
--
Visa mer
Webbplatskarta
Cookie-inställningar
Plattformens villkor