99.99% of VCs trying to fund Hyperliquid competitors would b | ThinkingUSD på Binance Square

Populära artiklar

Bokmärk och gillad

--

99.99% of VCs trying to fund Hyperliquid competitors would be better off just buying HYPE. 
You're misunderstanding what the Hyperliquid MOAT is, it's inherently unreplaceable with VC involvement.

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

287

0

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

@ThinkingUSD

Utforska mer från Creator

Anybody arguing that they should use a CEX because it hides your positions must have forgotten that every single exchange except for @coinbase has an internal desk. That internal desk theoretically has far more incentive to “hunt you” than market wide participants. Open, decentralized access to data is the original crypto ethos. Permissionlessly transacting value is original crypto ethos. Some of you seem to have forgotten that. You’re tourists. Hyperliquid.

--

Anybody arguing that they should use a CEX because it hides your positions must have forgotten that every single exchange except for @coinbase has an internal desk. That internal desk theoretically has far more incentive to “hunt you” than market wide participants. Open, decentralized access to data is the original crypto ethos. Permissionlessly transacting values is original crypto ethos. Some of you seem to have forgotten that. You’re tourists. Hyperliquid.

--

Betting on L1 and L2 tokens is betting that tech won't progress meaningfully and you've suddenly discovered the optimal way to transact value. It's also a bet that front ends which actually own the user will, for some reason, be loyal to your chain instead of grabbing as much value as they can for themselves. Users will have no idea what chains their assets are sitting on for the most part, this is a good thing for regulation and compliance, it makes checking the solvency of financial products much easier and independently possible. CLOBs are theoretically optimal ways to transact, fundamentally different bet.

--

Betting on L1 and L2 tokens is betting that tech won't progress meaningfully and you've suddenly discovered the optimal way to transact value. CLOBs are theoretically optimal ways to transact, fundamentally different bet.

--

What happens to Solana when pumpfun launches its own token and chain?

--

Senaste nytt

U.S. Stock Futures and Ethereum Experience Decline Amid Trade Remarks

--

Digital Euro Proposed as Solution to Cryptocurrency Risks in Europe

--

Hong Kong Enacts Stablecoin Regulation to Enhance Digital Asset Oversight

--

Crypto Market News: SEC Declares Crypto Protocol Staking Is Not a Securities Transaction — Major Win for U.S. Crypto Regulation

--

Crypto Investor James Wynn Reflects on High-Stakes Trading

--

Cookie-inställningar

Plattformens villkor

Plattformens villkor

Cookie-inställningar