How are we still unironically saying that centralized orderi

How are we still unironically saying that centralized ordering can be better than its decentralized counterpart because the former can pinky promise an outcome favoring users? I'm losing my mind here

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

163

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

toghrulmaharram

@toghrulmaharram

Utforska mer från Creator

BREAKING: The Microstrategy of Solana is announced, lead by some mysterious bald person

Twitter should switch from Proof-of-Discord consensus to Alpenglow, maybe that will fix the downtime issues.

My favorite cope in crypto is "bro, look at the project's advisors, how can they be duped?". Tell me that you're new here without telling me that you're new here.

For the retards telling me that censorship is fine as long as you can force include your transactions: go ahead, try trading on a protocol that allows you to transact once every 24 hours and tell me how the experience is?

The whole conversation around L2 stages and decentralization is just nonsensical. Unless you want to reorg with the base layer (which you don't want to do because you don't want to offer subpar UX), you have to introduce significant delays on L1-to-L2 messages (including force inclusion). As such, you end up in a scenario in which time-sensitive use cases (such as certain lending markets, pumpdotfun-style memecoin launchpads, etc.) are rendered completely useless in case of centralized sequencer censorship. So yes, while achieving stage 2 is important, sequencer decentralization is as important.

Senaste nytt

U.S. Government Considers Supreme Court Appeal to Maintain Tariffs

Russian Police Arrest Suspect in Cryptocurrency Mining Scam

BPX Exchange Secures FCA Approval for Institutional Services in the UK

Potential Rate Cuts Discussed Amid Tariff Negotiations

Santander Bank Explores Expansion in Digital Assets Amid European Banking Trends

Cookie-inställningar

.css-1iqe90x{box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;min-width:0;color:#EAECEF;}How are we still unironically saying that centralized ordering can be better than its decentralized counterpart because the former can pinky promise an outcome favoring users? I'm losing my mind here

Utforska mer från Creator

Senaste nytt

How are we still unironically saying that centralized ordering can be better than its decentralized counterpart because the former can pinky promise an outcome favoring users? I'm losing my mind here