People are missing the big picture on @stayloudio and what @0x_ultra built.

It’s not about spamming on X for an airdrop.

It’s about redefining how tokens launch and sustain themselves over time.

Allow me to explain:

Most projects spend millions of dollars on marketing campaigns and backdoor KOL deals to keep high mindshare and positive price action on their token over time.

This is problematic for many reasons:

• Creates misaligned incentives

• Requires significant human capital

• Lacks transparency and erodes trust

Loudio on the other hand is attempting something radically different.

A built in flywheel that requires

>no campaigns

>no outside VC money

>no active management

The model is built to actively sustains mindshare on a token.

How?

Through incentives.

Yappers are incentivized to bring volume to the token as they earn a percentage of trading fees.

The more volume the yappers bring in, the more fees, and more rewards go back to them.

In a way they are kind flipping the role of a traditional liquidity provider.

Instead of lending tokens to provide liquidity and earn fees, yappers are lending their account to provide attention and earn fees as a result.

Yes this experiment could flop and go out in a blaze of glory.

OR…it could create a whole new meta: IAOs. (Initial Attention Offerings as @beast_ico put it.)