Arthur Hayes just disclosed his main holdings: 60% BTC and 2 | wmougayar på Binance Square

Populära artiklar

Bokmärk och gillad

--

Arthur Hayes just disclosed his main holdings: 60% BTC and 20% ETH. No mention of you-know-who. 
@CryptoHayes @CoinDesk Live

Ansvarsfriskrivning: Inkluderar åsikter från tredje part. Ingen ekonomisk rådgivning. Kan innehålla sponsrat innehåll. Se användarvillkor.

BTC

104 846,83

+0.34%

ETH

2 515,21

-2.76%

2

0

Utforska de senaste kryptonyheterna

⚡️ Var en del av de senaste diskussionerna inom krypto

💬 Interagera med dina favoritkreatörer

👍 Ta del av innehåll som intresserar dig

E-post/telefonnummer

Relevant kreatör

@wmougayar

Utforska mer från Creator

The ups and downs of the tariffs drama in the US are reminiscent of the Gary Gensler’s crypto era situation: irrational, capricious, unpredictable, damaging, threatening, never ending. When does it end? How does it end?

--

Ethereum Leads Market with 46% Monthly Gains, Outperforming Bitcoin and DeFi https://www.tronweekly.com/ethereum-leads-market-with-46-monthly-gains/

--

Born on Thursday 30 July 2015 The ticker is ETH

--

No one who joined Ethereum was bought or paid to do so. Everyone is involved based on their own work, journey, convictions or choices. Be wary of other chains who have to pay big bucks (and give tokens) for people to join them, (or write a book about them), on top of bribing validators to validate transactions, half of which would be out of business without subsidies.

--

If your primary goal is maximizing bandwidth and minimizing latency, you’re likely building a networked database, not a blockchain. That’s because bandwidth and latency aren’t core blockchain foundational facets. While speed and scalability do matter, they are secondary to deeper mechanism related principles that define blockchains and their applications focus. Trying to use blockchains to replace databases means you’ll end up bloating throughput and manufacturing a bandwidth/latency problem that didn’t need to exist, chasing performance instead of prioritizing credibly neutral decentralization. And you will face brutal competition from the world’s best companies in this space: Oracle, Amazon, Red Hat and Microsoft, to name a few. Distributed databases have long delivered faster, cheaper transaction with the help of central coordination. That’s not what blockchains are for.

--

Senaste nytt

Trump Highlights Positive Economic Indicators on Social Media

--

Deutsche Bank Explores Stablecoins and Tokenized Deposits

--

SEC Announces Agenda for June 9 DeFi Roundtable

--

Stablecoins' Impact on Global Payment Networks and U.S. Treasury Holdings

--

Trump Considers Adjusting Debt Rates Amid Inflation Concerns

--

Cookie-inställningar

Plattformens villkor

Plattformens villkor

Cookie-inställningar