USNews

On September 20, U.S. Secret Service agents moved swiftly to arrest Jacob Samuel Winkler after he dangerously pointed a red laser directly at Marine One, the helicopter carrying President Donald Trump away from the White House. ✈️🔴
According to the incident report, Secret Service officer Diego Santiago noticed Winkler behaving erratically near The Ellipse, close to the White House. Suddenly, Santiago had a red laser beam flashed in his face 😳, and moments later, Winkler turned the device toward Marine One as it prepared for takeoff.
Officials stressed the serious risks lasers pose: temporary blindness, pilot disorientation, and potential loss of aircraft control—especially in crowded urban airspace 🏙️⚠️. Winkler was quickly subdued, and a 7.5 cm dagger was also recovered from him during arrest.
Witnesses say Winkler repeatedly knelt and apologized to President Trump upon being detained 🙇‍♂️. During questioning, he admitted to pointing the laser but bizarrely claimed he “did not know it was illegal” and compared it to pointing at traffic signs.
👉 Under federal law, pointing a laser at an aircraft is a felony, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. For now, it remains unclear if Winkler has secured legal representation.
⚡ This alarming act underscores the high security risks leaders face and the zero tolerance U.S. authorities maintain for threats to aviation safety.
#Security #TRUMP #USNews #alert 🚔🛑

Harvard University has taken legal action against the Trump administration in a dramatic lawsuit shaking the academic world. At stake are not only billions in federal funding but also the independence of universities across the United States.

⚖️ A Battle Over Billions
On Monday, Harvard filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump’s administration over what it calls the “unlawful” freezing of more than $3 billion in federal support. University president Alan Garber warned that the government’s actions could bring serious consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, and the global standing of American higher education.
The Trump administration claims Harvard failed to properly address antisemitism on campus. In response, it froze $2.2 billion in existing funding and is threatening to block hundreds of millions more in future grants.

🧑‍🎓 A Wave of Support From Other Universities
Harvard is not alone. Over 150 university presidents, including leaders from Princeton, MIT, Yale, and others, signed a joint statement opposing the “improper governmental intrusion” into campus life.
A leaked email from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) revealed internal directives to delay awarding grants to Harvard, Columbia, Brown, Cornell, and Northwestern. These five institutions received $1.7 billion in NIH grants just last year.

🛂 Cancelled Student Visas and Political Pressure
Meanwhile, the administration has cancelled hundreds of international student visas, demanding that schools hand over records of alleged “illegal or violent activity” by visa holders. The very ability to host international talent—a key pillar of U.S. global competitiveness—is now under threat.
Harvard’s response was firm: “We will not surrender our independence or our constitutional rights,” said Garber. The university is also preparing reports on antisemitism, anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian bias on campus, which are expected to be published soon.

💸 A Battle Over Education—and Image
The Trump administration is punishing Harvard for refusing to agree to stricter federal oversight—unlike Columbia University, which accepted revised governance and disciplinary policies. The standoff has sparked an outpouring of alumni donations and calls for coordinated resistance across universities.
While Harvard is financially resilient thanks to its $53 billion endowment—the largest of any university in the world, other schools may not survive such funding cuts. To manage the impact, many have begun using bond markets for liquidity and implementing hiring freezes and other cost-saving measures.

💬 What do you think? Should the government have the power to influence university funding based on political decisions?

#TRUMP , #CryptoNewss , #USPolitics , #LegalBattle , #USNews

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Washington, August 2–3, 2025 – The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) has officially launched an investigation into Jack Smith, the former Special Counsel who previously led criminal prosecutions against Donald Trump. The investigation focuses on whether Smith violated the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in political activity while performing their official duties.

🔍 What is the investigation about?:

The inquiry was initiated following a formal request from Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who accused Smith of acting with political motives during the 2023–2024 investigations into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his handling of classified documents.

Cotton claimed Smith's actions aimed to harm Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign — an accusation that, if proven, could amount to a violation of federal ethics laws.

⚖️ Legal Scope:

The OSC cannot file criminal charges but can recommend disciplinary actions, including removal from public service — though Smith has already stepped down in January 2025.

The focus is to determine whether Smith used his former DOJ role to influence political outcomes.

🗳️ Political Context:

Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in late 2022 to lead two high-profile Trump investigations.

After Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election, both cases were dismissed based on DOJ policy that bars prosecuting a sitting president.

In January 2025, Smith released a final report asserting there was “sufficient evidence” of criminal conduct in efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

🧭 Analysts' Reactions:

Legal experts have called this investigation “unprecedented”, especially since Smith is no longer in office. Critics argue that this move is politically motivated, especially with OSC now being led by Paul Ingrassia, a known Trump ally.

🔔 Follow for more updates on U.S. political events and their potential impact on the crypto markets.

#JackSmith #TRUMP #CryptoPolitics #USNews #BinanceSquareFamily
$BTC $XRP