STABLECOINS

Boston-based fintech firm Conduit has secured $36 million in Series A funding to scale its cross-border payment infrastructure that blends stablecoins and fiat currencies, positioning itself as a modern alternative to the aging SWIFT system.

The round was led by Dragonfly and Altos Ventures, with participation from Sound Ventures, Commerce Ventures, Digital Currency Group (DCG), Circle Ventures, and returning backers Helios Digital Ventures and Portage Ventures.

Conduit’s platform enables near real-time settlements by leveraging stablecoin rails and local fiat integrations, a stark contrast to the often multi-day process of traditional cross-border banking.

“Traditional cross-border payment systems do not meet the demands of modern businesses,” said CEO Kirill Gertman. He claims Conduit's clients have already saved 60,000 hours in settlement time and more than $55 million in fees since the company’s 2021 launch.

📈 Stablecoin Sector Sees Surging Investor Interest

Conduit's raise is the latest in a wave of funding for stablecoin-focused infrastructure, driven by institutional adoption and growing utility. According to DefiLlama, stablecoins now boast a combined market cap of $247 billion — up 54% year-over-year from $161 billion in May 2024.

Other notable raises include Cap’s $11M seed round in April and Plasma’s $24M in February. Meanwhile, Cedar Money secured $9.9M earlier this year for its own stablecoin-based payment platform.

Backing the trend is Circle, issuer of USDC and an investor in Conduit. The company is preparing for a $624 million IPO, targeting a $6.71 billion valuation, according to recent filings.

Bottom Line:

With investors betting big on stablecoin infrastructure, Conduit’s funding reflects growing momentum behind blockchain-native solutions to modernize the $150+ trillion cross-border payments industry.

$USDC #Stablecoins

Yesterday you were just checking charts, waiting for a good idea, maybe a new opportunity. You bought some stablecoin, let’s say USDC; just a bit to park your funds. And somehow, that small bit turned into enough for a brand new BMW off the factory line.
But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
Most of us still remember the Terra UST collapse. It wasn’t that long ago. For a moment, a wave of pessimism swept across the crypto world. A “stable” coin dropped to mere cents. And it seems we never fully recovered. That moment might have been crypto’s Chernobyl: everyone felt something had gone terribly wrong, even if not everyone said it aloud.
Now imagine the same thing, but reversed.
Not the stablecoin losing its peg to the dollar; the dollar losing its peg to the stablecoin.
Technically, you could call it a reverse depeg apocalypse; a stablecoin hypermoon.
It begins like any other day. Say it’s Saturday. You’re lying on the couch. Something lo-fi plays in the background, maybe on YouTube, maybe just in your head. You refresh your Binance app out of habit. And then, something feels off. You refresh again. Still wrong.
Your balance hasn’t just increased a bit; it has exploded. Your modest stablecoin holding has turned into a six-figure balance in dollars.
What happened?
Then you spot it. The top token on your portfolio list. You blink twice.

1 USD = 0.004 USDC.

Which means, for the math people: 1 USDC = 250 USD.
This wasn’t some pump. Not a meme coin rally. Not an airdrop. Not even Bitcoin waking up. Just a stablecoin doing the one thing it was never supposed to do: move.
It was the most boring, most sterile, most reliable creature in your portfolio zoo. A token built to never surprise you; built to just sit there with its predictable APR, doing nothing exciting. The name alone promised stability.
How could this happen?
The most vulnerable point in DeFi is not the code or the users. It’s the oracle.
No matter how decentralized the smart contract seems, it still needs outside data: prices fed in by services like Chainlink or smaller oracles. If that feed is corrupted, or manipulated, or simply fails, the system’s perception of reality collapses.
Imagine:
Someone frontruns the oracle update, exploits latency, a fallback fails. A glitch; or worse, an intentional distortion. Suddenly, USDC appears to be worth 100x or 400x.
Smart contracts follow blindly.
– Lending protocols recalculate collateral.
– AMMs misprice swaps.
– Margin systems trigger liquidations.
– DEXes freeze or spit out free money.
It’s a reverse rugpull. Not devs running with funds, but users cashing out from the bug. But only the absurdly fast.
CEXes shut down trading within minutes. Oracle teams issue emergency resets. On Square, everyone is screaming, “Why was I asleep?” And someone — maybe you — walked away with a 400x return.
Then comes the real chaos.
Chain rewinds? Victim compensation? What counts as a legitimate exit in a system-wide glitch?
Next day, on TV, the story gets buried below politics and weather. Some executive somewhere reads the line to the cameras:

“We have learned from this event and will improve our resilience going forward.”
And in this upside-down world, the most dependable thing turns out to be what’s backed by paper. Or maybe this was just a badly timed patch to the simulation.
For once, maybe only once in history, fiat was the safe haven, not the stablecoin.
#Stablecoins #Unstablecoin #TerraUSD