I found that among those who defend zksync, there is a common view:

You deserve to be counter-charged for having so many accounts, otherwise it is unfair to retail investors

I would like to ask, does zksync say that you cannot have multiple accounts?

Isn’t the concept of blockchain decentralized freedom?

Isn’t it centralized if one person has one account?

Doesn’t having multiple accounts require money, time, energy, and cost? Is having multiple accounts a privilege for some people? Can’t everyone have it? If you dare to think that you are willing to invest, you can also have it, how is it unfair? Aren’t you afraid of losing money or too lazy to do it or too lazy to learn?

What's more, zksync has been repeatedly emphasizing the importance of community pua rhetoric for four years in order to make their data look good.

This is a strong inducement for people, just like saying that we have airdrops, no witch check, come and get them, the more the better

Then the villain succeeds, once the airdrop is completed, the true colors are exposed, and the ugly appearance is full of them. When you need to brush the data, they will induce pua, and when they don't need it, they will say that you are airdrop farmers, and you deserve to be counter-charged?

If you really dislike airdrop farmers so much, why don't you say at the beginning that we will try every means to counter-charge you after the airdrop, and don't come to collect in batches?

What's more, this airdrop killed 90% of the addresses, which also means that 90% of the people in the community have been abandoned, including many retail investors with only one account. Why don't you say this?

And the most important point is that the airdrop addresses are full of official own 0 records, 0 interactions, 0 data of the mouse warehouse address, is this fair? Washing dog translation translation, what the hell is fairness? #币安合约锦标赛 #美联储连续第七次维持基准利率不变 #非农就业人数高于预期 #币安用户数突破2亿 #美国5月CPI超预期回落