The humanistic system is a complex concept that involves many aspects, including human behavior, social interaction, organizational structure, etc. In practice, the humanistic system often has some risks of oversimplification, which may lead to misunderstanding and misjudgment of the actual situation.
One common risk of oversimplification is the “black boxing” of human-centered systems. This risk refers to simplifying human behavior and social interactions into a series of input and output relationships, while ignoring the complexity and uncertainty involved. For example, in organizational management, managers may view employees as simple production factors, while ignoring the impact of employee subjective initiative, emotions and other factors on organizational performance.
Another common risk of oversimplification is the "atomization" of human-centered systems. This risk refers to treating human behavior and social interactions as isolated events, while ignoring the connections and interactions between them. For example, in social networks, people may only focus on the preferences and behaviors of individual users, while ignoring the mutual influence between users and the group behavior of social networks.
In order to avoid the risk of oversimplification of humanistic systems, we need to take several steps. First, we need to strengthen our understanding and research of human behavior and social interaction to better grasp the complexity and uncertainty involved. Second, we need to adopt a more comprehensive and systematic approach to consider all aspects of the humanistic system, such as using the methods of complexity science to study the dynamics and self-organization of the humanistic system. Finally, we need to constantly reflect on and revise our understanding and practice of the humanistic system in practice to avoid the risk of oversimplification.