Doubler Eyes (hereinafter referred to as eyes) is the first valuable asset issued by the project team in the ecosystem. Conventional thinking suggests that if the project team brags too much, it should be ready to ship. Unfortunately, the project team is a team that does not like or is not good at bragging. The only boast they have made is that they are ready to launch the mainnet at any time. In my opinion, the Free mint method and the 2222-piece limit do not seem to be a money-making method. If they really want to raise money and list the coin, wouldn’t it be more direct than listing NFT?
Why do we emphasize that it is the first valuable asset? Before that, I would like to talk about the launch selection activity of eyes. I will not talk about the process, but the visible results are:
1 More than 100,000 people participated;
2 Mainly ETH and Base, more than 60 million dollars of funds are paying attention to this event;
3 The official address has received more than 50,000 US dollars in assets.
Guess the official purpose:
Turn up the heat;
Understand the user's financial strength;
Accurately obtain the capital attention data on each chain;
Because many users will not use large wallets to participate due to risk awareness, this data is only the most basic data.
In my opinion, this result is a success in terms of data, but a failure in terms of intensity. Imagine that for such an innovative activity, a product like Doubler is mature and audited, has users, and has potential capital data. Which chain does not want such a Dapp to become its own ecosystem? If the intensity is strong enough, it will end up being an L2 war, which is a pity.
From my personal point of view, the result of the activity is relatively fair. Some people abused those who didn't win the prize. 1700/10w means 1.7% chance of winning. Isn't it normal not to win? Of course, I won't talk about whether there is really a rat market. From my point of view, if I am a user who is sure to get the free NFT, would I prefer the NFT to be in the hands of the studio rather than the project party? If the project party has no chips, will he pull the price? Why is it fair? First, the familiar faces in the community basically got the free NFT, and second, some studios did get a lot, and the positions on the chain can be checked and collected.
Now back to NFT, the project owner gave three possible empowerment expectations for the total amount of 2222 copies:
DBR airdrop, higher staking efficiency and fee refund after mainnet.
Because the DBR airdrop was previously announced to be only 1kw, this part of the airdrop is likely to come from the witch part. As for how much the witch will check, and whether she will give all or part of it after checking, it is not yet known.
There is no need to mention the efficiency of pledge. The higher the efficiency, the greater the value of NFT based on the price of Rivet DBR. The only thing that can be thought of for fee refund is the handling fee. Now let's do some calculations. If you participate in Douber with 1wU on the mainnet, the 0.2% handling fee for withdrawal is 20u. Don't think this number is small. When the number of transactions increases, even a discount will have great value. If the project is bigger, what if the NFT holders in a Pool are eligible to share part of the handling fee generated by the entire Pool? Then the value of this NFT will increase exponentially.
In fact, it is not just that. Students who are familiar with the testnet products should know that being the creator of a Pool in Doubler is absolutely a sure win. So can NFT be the threshold for building a pool? Doubler can list various tokens. Can NFT be used as the listing standard for Listing? Similarly, can all subsequent activities be carried out for NFT holders? Similar to the key customer label. Of course, this is all based on the fact that DBR has not been issued yet. It can be the same if NFT is replaced by DBR empowerment, but who makes NFT the first valuable asset that the official clearly states.
Back to the fundamentals, eyes is the first asset of the project, so we cannot fail to mention this. This is an asset issued by a project with financing, products and community. It is limited to 2222 copies. Excluding 100 copies for the team and 200 copies for marketing (marketing has only seen 20 copies issued within the community), the actual circulation is less than 2000 copies. Reversely deduce, if eyes is not valuable, why would the team keep 100 copies openly? Isn't this criticized? 200 copies are used for marketing. If it is not valuable in the future, who will be willing to pay for this worthless asset? Can the purpose of marketing be achieved? ——————————————————————————————
The above content was written when I had nothing to do one day. I originally planned to send a tweet to cheer up the project when the project party pulled the market, but unfortunately, the project party seems to always fall into the curse of CD for half a month after sending a tweet, so let's make it the first work of Binance Square. By the way, let's talk about recent activities. Recently, there have been two community activities, namely the community art design activity that has ended and the crocodile character acquisition activity that is ongoing. There is no need to say much about the rewards, but the first prize of the former is eyes NFT, and the second prize is 6 orange points. Orange is a role that has been emphasized from the beginning of the test network and can share huge rewards. There are 6 orange points, but there is only one NFT. The official Twitter of the latter activity eyes also sent a gift from the crocodile. It is obvious that the gift is NFT. Combined with the mod's speech, it is estimated that the final event score will also have NFT rewards. Although an NFT is currently only worth four or five hundred U, combined with these, it seems that the team does think that NFT has a higher value.
I currently hold more than ten eyes, and I have been buying them since 0.25, with the goal of 50. If you recognize doubler or if you have participated in the testnet, no matter if it is for profit or something else, please hold an eye if conditions permit.