There have been people talking about rolling positions in the comment section. This is called adding to positions with floating profits, trial positions, adding positions, and adding more positions... Livermore loved it the most, but his leverage was very high. Almost all trading books will introduce this operation method. You can understand it by reading a few more books. If you don’t understand it, it is probably because you haven’t even read the book.
However, there will be no detailed operations in the book. The specific operations are more related to experience and are difficult to quantify.
From this we can see that the term "rolling position" is not new. This term has become popular recently, probably because of me, in the B circle.
Some people use this to scold me and do great harm to others. I can only say that this is a common trading method. There is nothing special about it, and it is not invented by me. Moreover, the risk lies in the leverage, not the method.
Although rolling positions can reduce risks by reducing leverage, most rolling positions end at the original price because the market is mostly volatile and most people cannot accept a situation where nine out of ten operations fail to make a profit.
My choice is not to roll out easily to solve the problem of always being eliminated at the original price, but if I don't roll out easily, I will miss out on a possible big market trend. But I think missing out is much better than gaining and losing again, and you don't need to succeed many times. You only need to succeed four times in your life. In fact, I have only done it twice, and I have been looking forward to catching the next time.
So, if you really want to learn this, you might as well learn patience first. Before learning how to roll, learn not to roll first. Rolling is not rolling, and not rolling is also rolling. Why do you always insist on rolling or not rolling? #法师tony语录#
