Dear readers
Today I want to discuss this very delicate topic left over by many, when one enters this world of investments or buys an asset, always think about how to do it, whether by asking a close person, a specialist or searching on the internet. However, many other people choose these two options, first we have the TA (technical analysis) which is useful to know the condition of the market and especially the availability of the price, on the other hand, here I put special emphasis on the highly developed debate on the fundamentals, which help you know what the asset is about, what the project is, its projection and future intentions, of course, the TA can be used without knowing anything about fundamentals and vice versa.
As an investor and analyst that I consider myself, my point of view is based on my own experience, therefore, I consider that a light conclusion that I come to is that the market is dominated by narratives and macroeconomic situation. What I mean is that TA is effective for putting a narrative or macro analysis into context, however, this is not clairvoyance, which is why many use it to show off operations or simply explain a concept on a chart. minutes. This, in my opinion, is useless and unnecessary, the same goes for fundamentals, studying everything about an asset can be useful, but at the end of the day the market is always dominated by a global economy and a very pronounced context with respect to traditional.
Finally, my perspective leans much more towards the narrative, knowing how to combine these two to be able to know the current situation of the asset with respect to a macro framework of the financial economy. Only experience gives what I am talking about, one can always interpret the market in one's favor.
