I get what you’re pointing at. Let me reframe it in clearer trading/project terms:

When you say “the developers didn’t address the area of resistance” — in crypto it usually isn’t the devs who directly control resistance zones. Resistance is purely a market-driven level where sellers are sitting heavy. What the devs can do, however, is build strong fundamentals (utility, partnerships, demand mechanics) so that the project doesn’t keep crashing whenever it hits a wall.

Projects like $XRP and $BNB show that even when there’s strong resistance, demand + confidence push price upwards in the long run. That’s why you’re right — $Jager should be aiming for upward momentum, not collapsing under pressure. If a project keeps failing at resistances without bouncing back, it signals weak market conviction or lack of strong fundamentals.

👉 So the key is:

Resistance exists naturally in every chart.

Devs can’t erase it, but they can strengthen the project so buyers push through.

Long-term growth (like $XRP & $BNB) comes from solid fundamentals + adoption, not just short-term hype.

Do you want me to rewrite your original statement into a cleaner tweet-style post so it hits harder for the crypto audience?

#AltcoinSeasonLoading #CryptoIntegration #REVABinanceTGE #PowellWatch