Manos debiles vendan sus jager y dejen de contaminar. Se hace de la experta y anda detrás de monedas memes? Bueno cada Cual sigue a cada cual puesto que lá ignorância es libre.

Excuse me, I am not here to spread FUD, but I just want to ask the developer of Jager:
Why is there an internal function like this in your token?
You should know that I am a smart contract programmer, so you know my capacity.
Please explain the purpose of creating such an internal function.
You have already renounced ownership, but it turns out that control is still held through an internal function.

I am providing evidence of the vulnerability in the $Jager token smart contract, and the fact that the Jager token still retains developer control can be proven by the note on BscScan stating “OnlyOwner.”
This means the ownership renounce was not fully carried out, because if there is a note saying “OnlyOwner,” it indicates the presence of an internal function even after renouncing ownership.

I am also including proof from the $BOB token as a comparison, showing that BOB has fully renounced ownership since BscScan does not display any notes, including “OnlyOwner.”

If there is no clarification within the next 24 hours, I will write further and describe the meaning of the internal function you have.

{alpha}(560x51363f073b1e4920fda7aa9e9d84ba97ede1560e)