@Everyone
We are talking about Sesame actively inviting KEY to go online, but KEY may not necessarily go online. Can’t you understand this? If KEY is not good, would Sesame actively invite it? I am beginning to doubt whether everyone can see whether a project is good or not.
1. Actively providing benefits to private placement users, with a maximum return of 10 times. At the beginning of the private placement, the critics kept criticizing, but in the end, they were all proven wrong. Those who believed the critics made 10 times less profit. Even now, there are still people criticizing; you can go ahead and believe it, we won't explain anything, just grasp it yourself.
2. Actively giving up the fourth round of private placement and airdropping to token holders; the official does not want private placement to make money.
3. Professional exchanges like Sesame are better at evaluating projects than you are; they actively send invitations, and you still can't see the value. It can only be said: you completely lack understanding and won't make money in the crypto world.
Based on these three points, you all can reflect on it yourselves; I won’t say much more.