Have you ever encountered such a situation:
• After earning for several months, your name is not on the airdrop list
• Clearly, others did nothing, yet they took away the most rewards
• As soon as the project releases tokens, it starts "pulling random snapshots" or "distributing based on holdings"…
It's really annoying, right?
But I tell you: this all has to end!
Because there is now a project that allows you to prove on-chain "whether you earned, what you earned, how many times you earned"
It can even check whether others are just pretending!
It is the recently popular on-chain behavior verification system: Lagrange (LA)
💡 What exactly does it do?
In one sentence:
Turn "earning rewards" into a kind of "on-chain credit asset",
Then use the ZK proof system to package this "earning resume" into a proof that can be recognized by a contract!
Who earned?
Who just watches without acting?
Who frequently operates but always ends up lonely?
Who withdraws coins immediately after earning and runs away?
Everything can be checked on-chain, proved on-chain, and executed on-chain.
📦 How is it implemented?
It has a component called ZK Coprocessor, the user just needs to:
1. Write query conditions (like interaction times, voting records, staking behavior)
2. Call Lagrange to query all historical behaviors on-chain
3. System automatically generates ZK proof
4. The project party directly calls this proof, verifies in the contract → Airdrop / Rewards / Dividends / Voting rights
From querying → verifying → rewarding distribution, the entire process requires no trust, no screenshots, no stubbornness!
🚨 Let's give a few typical anti-fraud scenarios:
Do you understand it now?
The earning era 2.0 is transparent behavior, real proof, precise rewards!
🧠 So what value does LA have?
It is the fuel coin for the entire system:
• Do you want to generate ZK proof? Use it
• Do you want to call the network? Use it
• Do you want to participate in node operations, staking, task matching? Use it
• In the future, the project party will also need to interface with the incentive system using it!
In other words, as long as you believe on-chain behavior will be valued, LA cannot be useless.
📉 Then why isn't it exploding now?
Because this system doesn't widely shout about airdrops, doesn't play tricks, and doesn't have KOLs leading the narrative.
It's not a hot narrative, it's a future necessity.
Just like how Etherscan is needed on-chain, Celestia is needed for DA layer, and Alchemy is needed for RPC,
The on-chain behavior verification system needs Lagrange.
📣 Finally, to sum it up:
Don't believe in "earning means there are rewards", and don't brag about "I've interacted long ago".
In the ZK era, whether you earned or not is not up to you, it's determined by the chain.
👇 Do you want to check your wallet's "reward resume"? Are you brave enough to let Lagrange verify how much you actually earned?