You are still bragging: 'I've done ZKsync, Arbitrum, Starknet, Taiko, Blast, Berachain...'
But someone really asks: 'Did you actually do it? When did you interact? Is there any evidence?'
You immediately start to mumble: 'Uh... I think I have clicked on the official website... maybe I have bridged...'
Brother, stop pretending, now all of this can be checked, and it's solid proof on the chain!
Who checked? Not the project party, not your girlfriend, and not the on-chain hunters—
It's a new project: Lagrange ($LA )
🧠 What can it do? To put it simply:
It is the 'behavior proof machine' on the chain,
Whether you have done something, it can prove with ZK—did it! Really did it! Just this wallet!
💥 How to check? Very simple:
In the past, we relied on ourselves to remember, take screenshots, or trust Dune's charts for airdrops and interactions.
But checking a Blast interaction on Dune takes 5 minutes, and writing the wrong SQL makes you wait a day...
Now when you use Lagrange, just:
• Write an SQL statement (e.g., does this wallet interact with a certain protocol more than 10 times?)
• Lagrange backend directly pulls from historical data on the chain
• ZK module generates 'proof', packages it onto the chain, smart contracts read it directly
No one can change it, tamper with it, or forge it.
Isn't this just the 'on-chain transcript' of reward history?
📌 Let me give you a real-life scenario to ensure you understand:
A certain project wants to issue airdrops, and it wants to precisely give them to 'users who have genuinely interacted in the past 3 months.'
How did people do it before?
• Check the token holding snapshot
• API Integration
• Centralized judgment
• Then a bunch of bots are sent out...
Now using Lagrange:
✅ Define interaction behavior (e.g., interacting continuously 5 times + not withdrawn + non-first address)
✅ System automatically queries → ZK proof → Contract reads → Airdrop accurately distributed
If you are a bot, don’t think you can deceive,
If you are a real user, you can confidently receive airdrops.
Rewards, from now on, rely on technology, not performance.
🔥 So do you still dare to lie? Others can check on the chain whether you 'actually did it or not.'
What do you mean 'I have done Blast,' but when checked, you haven't even entered the official website;
What do you mean 'I have staked EigenLayer,' but when you look at the staking amount: 0.01ETH, and it was transferred away;
What do you mean 'I was already on zkSync,' but the address was created just 5 days ago.
Brother, times have changed.
💰 So is the Lagrange project worth participating in?
It's worth it! And very worth it!
It not only checks the history of rewards but its capabilities include:
• 🔍 Full-chain data ZK query (supports SQL)
• 🧠 AI reasoning verification (DeepProve)
• 🔗 Supports EigenLayer node operation
• 📦 Packaging proof to feed the contract, full-chain interaction closed loop
• 💡 Integrated with nodes like Mantle, Coinbase, OKX, etc.
and $LA is the fuel token for this network's operation!
📉 So why isn't it popular now?
Because most people only love 'issuing token airdrops,' not 'checking the on-chain ledger.'
But remember:
The next bull market is data-driven, behavior-driven, and driven by real on-chain identities.
At that time, those still using Excel to track their rewards will never grab the front row!
📣 The last point to hit the nail on the head:
The true god of rewards,
It's not about how many wallets, how many screenshots, or how loud you shout,
It can prove on the chain: 'I did it, and I deserve to receive the airdrop!'
👇 Now tell me, do you dare to expose your wallet address, get a Lagrange proof, and see how many big projects you have actually engaged with?
