I finally found the root cause.
Do you ever have this feeling:
• Every time you switch chains or wallets, it feels like fighting monsters.
• Mobile transitions fail, signing lags.
• There are many wallet apps, but none work smoothly.
I used to think it was 'wallets that are inadequate'.
But now I realize — it’s not that the wallets are bad, but the underlying connection methods are too primitive.
🚪 Who is redefining the 'door' to the experience on the chain?
After going through a lot of information, only one project is really solving this problem —
It’s not a new public chain, nor a wallet vendor, but the connection layer protocol itself.
What it aims to do is turn the 'on-chain connection experience' into a standardizable, billable infrastructure, making it affordable for developers and pleasant for users.
🧱 If Layer1 is the foundation and L2 is the highway, what does it resemble?
It’s like your home 'router'.
You might not notice it, but as soon as you lose internet, you realize how important it is.
All interactions on the future chain, from login, signing, to push notifications and session management, revolve around this protocol.
And its native token will, in the future, measure 'connection fees, electricity costs, and data fees'.
🧨 How should we view these types of fundamental tokens?
Don’t just focus on TVL and meme popularity.
Some tokens grow by being 'widely used in experience'.
they are slow, but have strong penetration and long life cycles.
$WCT belongs to this type of experience infrastructure token.
Now you know,
It's not that wallets are inadequate, but the underlying connection system is too outdated.
And the one solving it is precisely what #WalletConnect is doing.
Interestingly, it’s already integrated into many of your commonly used wallets; you just haven’t noticed.
Do you think future connection layer tokens could become the 'on-chain traffic meter' of Web3?
Welcome to chat 👇@WalletConnect
