#USStablecoinBill 📜 What are the key provisions?

0-1Full reserve backing & audits — Issuers must maintain 1:1 backing with high-quality assets (like cash or Treasuries) and undergo monthly audits  .

445-0Licensing & regulated issuance — Only federally or state-licensed entities (e.g., OCC or Fed-regulated) can issue stablecoins  .

611-0Ban on algorithmic stablecoins — To avoid collapses like Terra-LUNA, purely algorithmic designs are prohibited  .

749-0Consumer protections — Includes redemption rights, fraud prevention, and ensuring holders have priority in issuer bankruptcy cases  .

907-0Federal vs. state oversight — Smaller issuers under ~$10 billion can opt for state regulation, while larger ones fall under federal control  .

1074-0Exclusion from securities law — Clarifies stablecoins aren’t regulated as securities by the SEC or CFTC  .

---

🧭 Who’s pushing which bill?

Two primary legislative efforts are converging:

1205-1GENIUS Act (Senate) — Passed Senate committee 18–6. Includes provisions for offshore issuers complying with U.S. law; targeting floor vote soon  .

1464-0STABLE Act (House) — Introduced in March; differs slightly (e.g. foreign issuer rules). Now being reconciled with GENIUS Act  .

1616-0Target timeline — Aiming for final bill by August 2025  .

---

🔮 Why it matters

1. Boost in institutional and public trust

1702-1Clear regulation and auditability could make stablecoins viable for mainstream use in payments, DeFi, and cross-border transfers  .

2. Industry shake-up

1958-1Estimates suggest up to 70% of current stablecoins may fail to comply, leading to market consolidation  .

3. Balancing innovation and safety

2120-1By banning risky models while allowing licensed entities, the bill aims to foster innovation within a safer structure  .

---

🔍 Current status & outlook

Senate committee approval (GENIUS Act)

House deliberation (STABLE Act under negotiation)