When mouth-to-mouth becomes a new airdrop model, it indicates that competition is becoming increasingly fierce. Profits are dwindling. As a result, some project parties may violate the 'spirit of the contract,' not fully adhering to the initial commitments, and as soon as the TGE occurs, they may abandon their supporters.

Today, I have compiled the shares of those branded airdrop projects on @KaitoAI, making it more intuitive to participate in 'mouth-to-mouth'.

https://t.co/HeppwdL4c7

When selecting projects, it is important to be clear about the initial requirements of the project; some have very strict criteria for the top 50 or even top 20, how much of a chance do you really have? Of course, there are also some that clearly offer U or points, which raises the question of whether to participate in the competition!

For example, today's newly launched @MemeX_MRC20 clearly offers a huge opportunity for the top 500 Yappers. @infinex will distribute 1 billion µPatrons over several quarters, and the first quarter has been fulfilled on time.

For instance, recently @Humanityprot explicitly gave Yappers an airdrop, but after the TGE, they haven't mentioned it at all; is it because the time isn't right, or do they simply not want to give? Will the Kaito platform implement any measures to restrain the project parties? Otherwise, it will only tarnish the Kaito platform's reputation in the end. Don't end up like a certain platform that struggled with its first project.

If you like it, bookmark this table; more exciting content will be updated in a timely manner in the future!!!