Someone reviewed the boop project with me again yesterday, and I just learned that the KOLs in the boop system got on board early at 1 million (I am no longer looking at my holdings while rushing for dogs, but I feel like I have to pay attention again and downloaded gmgn back). People like me who got on at 2 million without knowing are actually just liquidity. The bigger problem is that it’s obvious they are not on the same page as the boop platform; when dingeling got on board, they just poured in, so construction is impossible.

From this perspective, bnbchain and eth actually have an advantage in playing “sunshine strategies” or in terms of construction, because players on these two chains are used to a slower pace; after buying, they hope to sleep well and not see their investment drop to zero the next day. A fivefold increase in a month is acceptable to me, and I can also tolerate short-term consolidation, like $janitor on bnbchain just after launching alpha, and the recent revival of the eth community with $zeus. Recently, avax also seems to have some sunshine strategy flavor, recovering losses with a wave of $fomo.

It’s not that sol is bad; I still really love sol. It's just that solana is not suitable for using too many cunning strategies here. Currently, there are actually only three types of projects in solana that can achieve great results: top-tier consensus, top-tier capital, or top-tier new narratives, corresponding to $labubu, $aura, and $launchcoin. The least needed among these three is cunning; even if there is cunning, it’s not a play where leaders gradually get on board. For top-tier consensus, cunning destroys consensus; for top-tier capital, cunning means a heavy burden; for top-tier innovation, at most, I just greet you and say I’m fine with buying or not. Playing sol focuses on smoothness and fluidity; a deliberately staged leader’s game is clearly too contrived.