Michael's saylor a genius or badboy.
Michael Saylor’s Policy:
He led MicroStrategy to convert most of its cash reserves into Bitcoin starting in 2020, treating BTC as a superior store of value over fiat currency.
✅ Arguments in Favor (Why It’s “Good”)
Hedge Against Inflation:
Saylor believes the US dollar is losing value due to inflation.
Bitcoin, with its fixed supply, is seen as a digital gold or "hard money."
Massive Long-Term Gains:
MicroStrategy bought large amounts of Bitcoin below $30k.
As of 2025, their BTC holdings are worth billions, showing huge unrealized gains.
Leadership in Institutional Crypto Adoption:
His bold move encouraged other companies and investors to take crypto more seriously.
Strong Conviction Strategy:
His consistent messaging and refusal to sell Bitcoin gives confidence to long-term believers.
❌ Arguments Against (Why It’s “Bad”)
High Risk / High Volatility:
Bitcoin is extremely volatile; it can swing 20–30% in days.
This exposes the company to huge fluctuations in valuation.
Lack of Diversification:
MicroStrategy became a “Bitcoin proxy” rather than a software company.
Critics argue this undermines its core business model.
Debt-Fueled Accumulation:
MicroStrategy issued debt (convertible bonds) to buy more BTC.
If BTC price falls dramatically, the company could face solvency risks.
Overconfidence in a Speculative Asset:
Some view Saylor’s approach as speculation, not investment.
Verdict: Good or Bad?
If you’re pro-Bitcoin and believe in its long-term adoption → Saylor is a visionary.
If you’re risk-averse or skeptical of crypto → Saylor is reckless or overly speculative.
