Recently, X (formerly Twitter) suddenly took action and banned a large number of accounts belonging to KOLs in the crypto space, sparking widespread attention within the community. #X平台封号 is not only domestic; some foreign accounts were also not spared. This wave of actions feels somewhat 'familiar'—many joked that X is starting to 'Weibo-ize'? 😮‍💨

According to some discussions in the community, the commonality of these banned accounts may be related to having the 'gmgn' identifier in their nicknames and frequently interacting with each other. The platform may have identified these accounts as engaging in 'marketing matrix' behavior, leading to centralized processing. In other words, this is not just an issue with individual accounts but could be a 'systematic cleanup' targeting certain types of social network behavior.

This raises deeper concerns: if the platform becomes increasingly sensitive to such 'organized operations' in the future, common tactics like KOL groups, mutual promotion, and collaboration might also be treated as 'violating marketing' practices.

For the crypto space, this is undoubtedly adding insult to injury. On one hand, the window for new users to obtain information is shrinking, while on the other hand, the channels that old users rely on to receive signals are also being disrupted.

The bigger question is: if even overseas platforms start tightening their tolerance for crypto-related content, the entire industry's information dissemination environment may undergo a profound reconstruction.

In the current environment, it is no longer enough to rely solely on 'good content' for dissemination; one must also be cautious about the boundaries of 'methods' and 'social behaviors'. This may be a signal: the future of crypto content dissemination needs to be more decentralized and less platform-dependent to go further. 🌐