The Ethereum Magnificent Seven | wmougayar on Binance Square

Trending Articles

Bookmarked and Liked

--

The Ethereum Magnificent Seven

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

ETH

2,427.65

-0.45%

AAVE

255.64

-0.69%

1.6k

0

Explore the latest crypto news

⚡️ Be a part of the latests discussions in crypto

💬 Interact with your favorite creators

👍 Enjoy content that interests you

Email / Phone number

Relevant Creator

@wmougayar

Explore More From Creator

Why Crypto Prices Should Decouple from Macro and Geopolitical Noise Digital assets are built on fundamentally different premises than fiat-based markets Bitcoin and Ethereum were designed as non-sovereign digital assets. Yet markets still treat them like tech stocks, swinging wildly with inflation prints or central bank guidance.

--

https://ethdigitaloil.com - The Bull Case Paper https://onethereum.org - Marketing Site https://ethmrc.com - Research Center https://ethereumdashboards.com/ - 100+ Dashboards

--

Revisiting the DCF argument for Blockchains Although I have already made a clear case for why Ethereum Should Not be Valued Based on Fees or Discounted Cash Flow (https://t.co/yPtk8mxSl7), the DCF and Fee-Based Model is simply misapplied logic. Applying traditional metrics to blockchains is shortsighted, but if a chain like Solana wants to apply it to themselves, that’s fine. But don’t apply it to Ethereum, because Ethereum is way beyond that. DCF, validator revenue, or protocol fees miss the point. It is the equivalent of valuing Amazon in 1998 by its shipping costs. If you see Solana like a software-as-a-service (SaaS) company, estimating its future cash flows and discounting them back to present value, that’s fine. But don’t apply it to Ethereum because Ethereum is not that. The DCF framework quickly collapses under scrutiny: * Blockchains aren’t companies. They don’t have shareholders, retained earnings, or management seeking to maximize profits. But if Solana sees themselves otherwise, fine, do it for yourself, but not for Ethereum. * Fee structures are dynamic and often political. Protocols can—and do—lower fees for strategic reasons (e.g., Layer 2 scaling). * Subsidies distort reality. Solana heavily subsidizes validator revenues, which inflates perceived “earnings” without reflecting the real, organic usage. So, maybe one should discount the Solana DCF by the % amounts being artificially subsidized. That’s at least 25%, if not more. Ultimately, DCF assumes a central issuer and a predictable revenue stream, neither of which are natural to decentralized public blockchains. But then, Solana is not a public blockchain. It is tilting more as being a private blockchain. So, let’s not compare Solana to Ethereum on that basis. Let Solana be judged against database companies or Hyperliquid and let’s see how it fares.

--

So tell me if each headline is not bullish for Ethereum. https://ethmrc.com/

--

Ethereum is still the king of the hill in DeFi. And by adding 2 L2’s, Ethereum’s TVL is x8 times the closest competitor. I rest my case. TVL: Top 10 Alternative Chains Diversifying DeFi, Ethereum Maintains Dominance https://blockchainreporter.net/tvl-top-10-alternative-chains-diversifying-defi-ethereum-maintains-dominance/

--

Latest News

Crypto Ponzi Scheme Leader Sentenced to Nearly Eight Years in Prison

--

Japan and U.S. Hold Talks on Tariff Policies

--

Market Sentiment Remains Bearish as Funding Rates Indicate Downtrend

--

U.S. Senate Unveils Revised $4.2 Trillion Tax and Spending Plan

--

NOYA.ai Investigates Potential Security Vulnerability

--

Trending Articles

$BTC pumped after clearing the lower side liquidity and now

DeCrypto TokenTalks

As of today, I can confidently say that even if we have 10 b

Farrah Depetris qTix

THE FINAL BOUNCE BEFORE THE BLOODBATH.

Learn this simplest method of trading cryptocurrencies, and

Get future signals 971521542350

XRP Insiders Dump $68M Daily—Smart Money Exit from the Dust

Cookie Preferences

Cookie Preferences