I came across a KOL article today that seemed very exaggerated; they offer a 30% profit share for quantitative trading, and losses are borne by the individual. They even specifically publish articles to attract large investors who are new to the crypto world and unfamiliar with it. They call it selecting quality clients, but in reality, it’s a compliance test; anyone who can think critically and find ways to lose money is kicked out.
I refute his comments. He said that his trading is equivalent to private equity.
1. Private equity funds have large volumes and a much higher risk resistance compared to this kind of zp quantitative team (or individual). Moreover, private equity generally only takes a 20% profit share.
2. Private equity funds are diversified investments; they don’t only do quantitative trading. The team is professional, and if one project loses money, they can make up for it from other sources. If you find a beautifully spoken quantitative team in the crypto world and invest 30,000 USDT, once you lose it all, you won’t even have a place to cry.
3. You say your quantitative model makes money and is stable, but you could easily find a large investor in reality; don’t just boast about millions in the crypto circle. What? You don’t know any large investors? If you can’t even connect with wealthy people in reality, you can only say you're a loser and shouldn't pretend to be a technician. People in reality can’t trust you; why should you trust them? Whoever believes you, I will laugh at them.
If you need a commission rebate, fill in CPDD0451, or we can discuss quantitative trading together; it's only for discussion. I will also share some targets later, and everyone can look at them dialectically. I also accept criticism. That’s all.
