I've seen many people discussing Websea's "Capital Protection Copy Trading" these days.

Many people, upon hearing "loss compensation," feel it's unreliable and think, how could such a good thing exist? It sounds like a scam.

But actually, after doing some research, I found that many times people only see "capital protection" but overlook the profit-sharing mechanism behind it.

Websea's capital protection copy trading is actually supported by "profit-sharing from lead traders + subscription fees" to maintain the entire model's operation.

Specifically, lead traders can set their own profit-sharing ratio, for example, set it to 30%.

That means that the money you earn from copy trading will have 30% shared with them.

Assuming you copy trade with 1000U and earn 500U, you would need to share 150U with the lead trader.

If 100 people are copying him at the same time, he could earn 15,000U in profit-sharing, that's a direct win!

Additionally, with the subscription fees from each copy trader, it means that for lead traders, this mechanism can provide a continuous income—provided they can make money while trading, and their skills are solid.

More importantly, being a lead trader is not just about earning a bit of profit-sharing.

If they operate steadily and achieve excellent returns, they can accumulate many copy trading users, build their own trading influence, and personal brand.

Whether becoming a star trader supported by the platform or accumulating numerous loyal followers, this is a very good opportunity for many capable lead traders to stand out.

The platform itself does not directly bear the compensation pressure; the core of the capital protection mechanism is:

If there are losses in copy trading, the system will use the lead trader's margin for compensation.

In other words, the more the lead trader earns, the more capable their margin is to guarantee the safety of the copy traders' capital.

This is a mechanism similar to a "profit and loss sharing pool." Users see "capital protection," but behind it is a systemic risk sharing.

Of course, if the lead trader is willing to earn this money, they must also assume responsibility. If they frequently incur losses, their own income will also be affected.

The platform relies on traffic monetization to attract new users, which is a more macro ecological game for them.

After all, the transaction fees collected by the exchange are the main source of income! Regardless of whether the lead trader is accurate or not, the platform will always profit from the fees, and compensation does not need to come from the platform.

For ordinary retail investors, if they don't want to risk trading contracts themselves and don't understand the market, trying this "capital protection copy trading" is actually a way to reduce risk.

Even if they end up with losses, they only pay some subscription fees and transaction fees, and they won't be wiped out.

From the perspective of risk and profit sharing:

Lead traders earn profit-sharing and bear compensation;

Platforms attract users, maintain ecology, and earn transaction fees;

Users copy trade and reduce risk.

So looking at it this way, the logic of this model is actually feasible.

Of course, I recently received some merchandise from Websea, and having done some research, I can say a few honest words.

At least for now, this mechanism is much more reliable than most methods that rely on "shouting orders" to exploit retail investors.