Other projects are becoming 'EOSified', A has completed its rebirth

Once renowned for its powerful technology, EOS ultimately fell into a quagmire of foundation negligence, community silence, and ecological standstill. Block.one (B1) has long been cashing out and lacking in construction, which ultimately led EOS from its glory to obscurity.

However, the failure of EOS is not the end. It was awakened by the community and reshaped into a brand new A through '1:1 voluntary exchange'—completely severing control from B1 and discarding the old model, restarting comprehensively in terms of mechanism, governance, and incentive structure, completing a transformative self-revolution.

A no longer relies on financing to tell its story, nor does it have a capital foundation controlling it. It is driven by real on-chain tasks and community participation in governance, building a decentralized new order. In the past, limited by the lesson of 'superficial decentralization but actually highly centralized', A is among the first batch of projects to actively break away from the old model.

Ironically, many other mainstream public chains are step by step taking the old path of 'EOSification': the foundation has too much voice, project technology stagnates, and users are merely tools for market value; some have even begun to 'B1ify', frequently hyping concepts, airdropping to create momentum, and community participation feeling increasingly weak.

Today's A has achieved 'self-rescue from centralization', while other chains are replicating EOS's history. A is not another new coin but a rare new paradigm that has truly emerged from failure. The future belongs to those projects that dare to revolutionize themselves, rather than those that package old shells to tell new stories of pseudo-narratives.