To state a fact, the handling of security incidents for ETH, SOL, and BTC is the same. The decentralization we pursue should not come at the expense of innocent people's property. The vulnerabilities themselves are design flaws in technology, not failures of the blockchain consensus mechanism.

• Ethereum rolled back The DAO attack in 2016 with a hard fork, saving ETH worth 60 million dollars at that time (3.6 million ETH, valued at 1 billion dollars according to current prices).

• Solana has experienced multiple outages - September 2021, May 2022, February 2023.

• Bitcoin rolled back a vulnerability from 2010 that created 18.4 billion BTC. Yes - billion, and that BTC is long gone.

However, when SUI freezes 160 million dollars of stolen funds through protective mechanisms and the validating nodes freeze it, pausing the protocol to protect user assets, many people question it, saying "Centralized! Scam!"

The key is not whether centralized technology is used, but whether these mechanisms are transparent and controllable, and whether they align with community consensus.

If your understanding of decentralization is "allowing hackers to take money and run freely," then BTC and ETH would have long ceased to exist, and your assets could not be protected and could be plundered. This is not decentralization, but anarchism.