#我的EOS交易 Technical Positioning:

EOS, as a representative of high-performance public chains, adopts the DPoS (Delegated Proof of Stake) consensus mechanism, sacrificing some decentralization features to optimize performance, achieving high throughput (theoretical TPS can reach thousands) and low transaction latency. Early on, it was praised as the 'Ethereum killer' due to its technical advantages, but in recent years it has gradually fallen behind emerging public chains like Solana and Avalanche in ecological expansion and developer attraction, weakening its competitive advantage.

Core Issues:

1. Lack of Ecological Growth:

- Limited number of popular project categories such as DeFi, NFT, GameFi, with a scarcity of leading applications.

- Developer activity and new project growth rate significantly lower than competitors, insufficient siphoning effect of users and funds.

2. Controversies in Governance and Mechanism:

- Long-standing issues of node centralization, with the model of 21 supernodes raising doubts about decentralization.

- Resource model (CPU/NET/RAM) is complex, with a high user experience threshold, hindering large-scale adoption.

3. Slow Development Progress:

- Block.one (original core team) has strategically contracted, gradually reducing investment, and shifting focus to other businesses.

- The community-led development model is inefficient, key upgrades (such as EOSIO 2.0, 3.0) are slow to advance, and technological iterations lag behind market pace.