Over the past 100 days, Trump has made bold and disruptive moves:
He imposed a sweeping 25% tariff on several countries, igniting what many are calling Tariff War 2.0 and triggering a wave of risk-averse market behavior.
In a surprise move, he signed an executive order establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve, effectively bringing BTC into the realm of national policy.
In response, several U.S. states have started exploring how to integrate cryptocurrencies into their fiscal systems.
On the surface, these actions appear aimed at "defending the dollar’s sovereignty" and "redefining U.S. economic security."
But beneath that surface lies a more unsettling reality: these moves are amplifying global market uncertainty.
Tariffs are straining supply chains and prompting capital flight.
At the same time, the nationalization of Bitcoin undermines its core principle—decentralization.
Once state actors begin hoarding crypto, setting prices, and regulating its flow, can Bitcoin still be called free?
We may be witnessing the start of a new, state-led era for crypto assets.
Retail investors and private institutions are being pushed to the sidelines.
Going forward, BTC’s value may no longer hinge solely on market sentiment, mining power, or headlines—
but also on how much Bitcoin central banks have stockpiled.
Bottom line: Trump isn't embracing crypto—he's leveraging it as a tool in the geopolitical financial game.
The U.S. isn’t giving up on dollar hegemony; it's just trying to rewrite it—this time, on the blockchain.
---
