#AltcoinETFsPostponed

Postponed: Strategic Vision or Regulatory Fear?

With the increasing institutional interest in the world of cryptocurrencies, the focus is no longer limited to "Bitcoin" and "Ethereum" only; attention is now turning towards alternative coins (Altcoins) like Solana, Polkadot, and Avalanche. Despite the growing demand from investors for the launch of ETFs based on these currencies, U.S. regulatory authorities, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have decided to postpone the approval of many of these funds. However, is the postponement merely a regulatory caution? Or is it a hidden strategy with deeper economic and geopolitical implications?

Is there a "Political Order" for cryptocurrencies?

It is rare to discuss the idea that there is a "political order" for cryptocurrencies, as some currencies are marketed and adopted gradually according to global economic priorities. For instance, the Bitcoin ETF was passed after years of waiting, while the Ethereum ETF is still in the approval queue. As for alternative currencies, despite their technical development, they are always placed in the waiting category.

Could it be that regulatory authorities are waiting for a mature regulatory environment that allows for the introduction of alternative currencies under a stricter system before allowing them to be traded widely in public markets?

Delayed Altcoin ETF Funds

The postponement of investment funds freezes part of the institutional liquidity that was supporting emerging blockchain projects.