#AltcoinETFsPostponed
Postponed: Strategic Vision or Organizational Fear?
As institutional interest in the world of digital currencies grows, the focus is no longer limited to "Bitcoin" and "Ethereum"; attention is now turning towards alternative coins (Altcoins) such as Solana, Polkadot, and Avalanche. Despite the increasing demand from investors for the launch of ETFs based on these currencies, U.S. regulatory bodies, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have decided to postpone the approval of many of these funds. But, is the delay merely a regulatory caution? Or is it a hidden strategy with deeper economic and geopolitical dimensions?
Is there a "Political Order" for digital currencies?
It is rare to discuss the idea that there is a "political order" for digital currencies, where certain currencies are marketed and adopted gradually according to global economic priorities. For example, the Bitcoin ETF was passed after years of waiting, while the Ethereum ETF is still in the approval queue. As for alternative currencies, despite their technical development, they are always placed in the waiting category.
Could it be that regulatory bodies are waiting for a more mature regulatory environment that allows the introduction of alternative currencies under a stricter system before permitting their widespread trading in public markets?
Delayed Altcoin ETF Funds
The postponement of investment funds freezes part of the institutional liquidity that was supporting emerging blockchain projects.$BTC