#AltcoinETFsPostponed Strategic Vision or Organizational Fear?

With the increasing institutional interest in the world of digital currencies, the focus is no longer limited to "Bitcoin" and "Ethereum" only. Attention is now turning to alternative currencies (Altcoins) such as Solana, Polkadot, and Avalanche. Despite the growing demand from investors for the launch of ETF funds based on these currencies, American regulatory bodies, particularly the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have decided to postpone the approval of many of these funds. But, is the delay merely a regulatory reservation? Or is it a hidden strategy with deeper economic and geopolitical dimensions?

Is there a "political arrangement" for digital currencies?

It is rare to discuss the idea that there is a "political arrangement" for digital currencies, where some currencies are marketed and adopted gradually according to global economic priorities. For example, the Bitcoin ETF was passed after years of waiting, while the Ethereum ETF is still in the approval queue. As for alternative currencies, despite their technical development, they are always placed in the waiting category.

Could regulatory bodies be waiting for a mature regulatory environment that allows for the introduction of alternative currencies under a stricter system before allowing them to be traded widely in public markets?