In-depth analysis of the Bitget exchange controversy
Core of the incident:
1. Users cannot withdraw their profits: Many users reported that they encountered withdrawal difficulties after Bitget made profits
2. The exchange took legal action: Bitget chose to sue some profitable users instead of solving the problem
3. The background of the group is questionable: Similar disputes have occurred in multiple financial projects under the same controller
Map of companies involved (investors are advised to be vigilant):
Digital currency exchange: Bitget
Public chain project: Morph
Hong Kong licensed exchange: OSL (@osldotcom)
Financial services: Qianhai Junchuang Fund (once defended for similar issues)
Media and investment: Foresight
Analysis of key points of the incident:
1. Business model dispute:
The exchange was suspected of adopting a "betting model "Operation
Set withdrawal barriers when users make profits, and unimpeded when they lose money
2. Abnormal legal means:
Exchanges rarely sue profitable users in normal business disputes
This move is interpreted as a means of deterring other users
3. Historical behavior patterns:
Many projects under the controller Liu Shuai have encountered the problem of "difficulty in cashing out user profits"
Indicates that there may be systemic risks
Investor response suggestions:
1. Carefully choose trading platforms, giving priority to transparency and historical reputation
2. Diversify asset allocation to avoid large positions on a single platform
3. Keep complete transaction records and do a good job of evidence preservation
4. Be vigilant about high-yield promises and guard against financial traps
Industry warning:
This incident reflects the deep-seated problems of some exchanges: when the interests of the platform conflict with the interests of users, some institutions will choose to sacrifice the rights and interests of users. Investors need to be aware that in areas where there is a lack of effective supervision, platform selection is more important than trading skills.
