Recently, JP Mullin (https://x.com/jp_mullin888) stated that he is ready to burn all tokens intended for the team, after a wave of criticism from the community and investors. But before making a decision, he conducted a 'temperature check' — a poll of community opinions.
But the main thing is not the numbers, but what specific options were proposed in the poll — they show what solutions are actually being considered by the team. Let's analyze each of them and assess the pros and cons.



1. Burn all tokens immediately.

  • + Pros:

    • Maximum level of trust from the community.

    • Completely eliminates the fear of a team 'dump'.

    • Strong signal: the project prioritizes the community over personal gain.

    • Potentially positively impacts the token price (less supply).

  • – Cons:

    • The team remains without resources for development.

    • Loss of long-term motivation for key participants.

    • Impossible to reverse — a step without a return path.



2. Extend vesting for years.

  • + Pros:

    • Retains tokens as a motivational tool.

    • Delays potential market pressure.

    • Allows the team to be interested in the project's long-term growth.

  • – Cons:

    • The community may not believe in 'long vesting' — trust has already been undermined.

    • Does not exclude the possibility of sales in the future.

    • Weak signal for the market compared to 'burn'.



3. Transfer to the community multisig.

  • + Pros:

    • Control over tokens is gained by the community — decentralization of decisions.

    • Tokens can be used for grants, listings, marketing, etc.

    • Increases transparency in fund management.

  • – Cons:

    • Trust in the signers of the multisig wallet is required.

    • Possible passivity or abuse within the multisig group.

    • Risk of conflicts or delays in decisions.



4. Unlocking upon achieving goals.

  • + Pros:

    • Receiving tokens depends on results — a fair approach.

    • Motivates the team to achieve KPIs and genuinely advance the project.

    • Allows flexible management of rewards and progress.

  • – Cons:

    • Difficult to define and objectively measure metrics.

    • Disputes may arise over what constitutes an 'achievement'.

    • A mechanism for assessing and verifying results is needed.



Important: JP emphasized that this is a poll, not a final decision.


"X polls are easily botted. We want the final decision to be made transparently and justified."



Which option do you support?$OM

#OM