Recently, I've been receiving push notifications, and upon opening the BN Square, all I see is Liangxi making huge profits.

Suddenly making 15 million is comparable to nearly a year's profit of a listed company.

As a result, many people want to learn how to make big profits like Liangxi.

However, they never considered that those who go against Liangxi would suffer huge losses.

Those who suffer huge losses seldom speak up, while those who make big profits gain attention and become the focus of the market.

Thus, he became a role model in the market, allowing those who want to turn their fortunes through trading coins to find a benchmark; they admire and envy him.

But today I want to tell a truth.

Now this market is no longer the ineffective market it used to be; it has become an effective market, with various robots and quantitative strategies participating in trading at all times.

Players in the cryptocurrency market, market makers, and arbitrageurs are all fully involved, and making money through market movements without an information advantage has become very difficult.

You must remember one thing: without an information advantage, it's impossible to make money.

At every stage of the market, there are hundreds of strategies running, and Liangxi's strategy just happened to emerge.

Now the current market conditions just happen to align with his strategy.

However, the market is not static.

The so-called source of profit and loss is that both making money and losing money are caused by the same strategy; it's just that the strategy fits the market at that time to make money.

If one day the strategy no longer aligns with the market, then this strategy will lead to significant losses.

No one can make their strategy fit the market's conditions at every stage all the time.

Therefore, the money Liangxi made is not aligned with 1000 other strategies, while his strategy just fits the market.

Thus, everyone loses, while he makes huge profits.

If you don't believe it,

I can share a methodology with everyone: according to the effectiveness of probability statistics, the sample size must be greater than 30 to be considered meaningful statistics.

You should follow those who are making money in real trading; a strategy is meaningful only if they make money in more than 16 out of 30 trades.

In other words, you can't just look at how others are currently making money; you need to continuously track them for 30 times, and then if they win more than 16 times, that strategy is meaningful for the current market, but after this stage it may become ineffective immediately, as others in the market will surely discover this profitable strategy, and once more people start using it, it will inevitably fail.

Those who have played contracts and made huge profits cannot stop. They can only continue down this path.

There are only two outcomes: the first is that if you manage to preserve your wealth in time and make good asset allocations, you can ensure a worry-free life in the later years.

In the second case, when the strategy does not align with the market strategy at that time, it will lead to huge losses, ultimately giving everything back to the market.

However, very few people can choose the first outcome.

In comparison to various strategies in the market, holding onto coins is worth less than a leg hair.

Maybe you think that if I tell another joke now, you'll mock me.

But when you look back at today after ten years, you'll understand that those strategies that once made huge profits will become history.

Only holding coins, a simple strategy of buying and not selling, can take you to the other side.