SCDO—暴富社区
--
#持有SCDO未来星辰大海
Question 23: What are the differences between ZPoW and traditional PoW like Bitcoin?
Answer: Compared to Bitcoin's SHA-256 PoW, ZPoW differs in both algorithmic form and strategy:
1) Algorithm Complexity: Bitcoin PoW pursues simple hash collisions, which can be easily accelerated by ASIC chips; ZPoW uses complex computations (such as random matrix determinant calculations), making it difficult to develop ASIC-specific mining machines.
2) Hardware Friendliness: Traditional PoW heavily relies on high-performance hardware, making it nearly impossible for ordinary people to gain computational competitiveness with CPUs; ZPoW minimizes parallelization advantages, allowing consumer hardware to participate in mining.
3) Multi-Algorithm Mixing: Bitcoin only has a single algorithm, leading to high risks of power concentration; ZPoW introduces multiple computational tasks for dynamic balancing, preventing any single algorithm from being monopolized.
4) Energy Consumption: BTC PoW consumes an astonishing amount of electricity due to large-scale computational competition; ZPoW is designed to be more efficient in computation (useful computation or reducing unnecessary computation), resulting in lower energy consumption at the same level of security.
5) Difficulty Adjustment: Both have difficulty adjustment mechanisms to ensure target block time, with Bitcoin adjusting every 2016 blocks, while SCDO's difficulty adjustment is more flexible (potentially more frequent or adjusted independently by algorithm) to accommodate mixed algorithm architectures. Overall, ZPoW represents a deep improvement over traditional PoW, aiming to retain the advantages of decentralized and secure proof of work while addressing issues of efficiency and fairness.
Question 23: What are the differences between ZPoW and traditional PoW like Bitcoin?
Answer: Compared to Bitcoin's SHA-256 PoW, ZPoW differs in both algorithmic form and strategy:
1) Algorithm Complexity: Bitcoin PoW pursues simple hash collisions, which can be easily accelerated by ASIC chips; ZPoW uses complex computations (such as random matrix determinant calculations), making it difficult to develop ASIC-specific mining machines.
2) Hardware Friendliness: Traditional PoW heavily relies on high-performance hardware, making it nearly impossible for ordinary people to gain computational competitiveness with CPUs; ZPoW minimizes parallelization advantages, allowing consumer hardware to participate in mining.
3) Multi-Algorithm Mixing: Bitcoin only has a single algorithm, leading to high risks of power concentration; ZPoW introduces multiple computational tasks for dynamic balancing, preventing any single algorithm from being monopolized.
4) Energy Consumption: BTC PoW consumes an astonishing amount of electricity due to large-scale computational competition; ZPoW is designed to be more efficient in computation (useful computation or reducing unnecessary computation), resulting in lower energy consumption at the same level of security.
5) Difficulty Adjustment: Both have difficulty adjustment mechanisms to ensure target block time, with Bitcoin adjusting every 2016 blocks, while SCDO's difficulty adjustment is more flexible (potentially more frequent or adjusted independently by algorithm) to accommodate mixed algorithm architectures. Overall, ZPoW represents a deep improvement over traditional PoW, aiming to retain the advantages of decentralized and secure proof of work while addressing issues of efficiency and fairness.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.
1
0