Avoid雷#比特币三姐 #吃客损 #诈骗 I am a paid member with personal experience!

I want to clarify my point: how bad a person's character is is not shown in their usual good behavior, but in how disgusting their true face is when encountering problems! I found some posts exposing #Bitcoin Sister San through Google search, and also found a group she scammed with a large number of people, discovering that this person (team) not only has bad character but is undoubtedly a scam gang.

I have been following YouTube 'Bitcoin Sister San' for a few months and have watched every video, because the content is indeed theoretical, I feel like I have learned something. I mistakenly thought this person was reliable.

Seeing the profit screenshots shared in the public strategy group and member feedback, I mistakenly thought they were confirmed valid. I also followed trades in the public group, but most were small profits, yet just a few losses could wipe out the previous profits, and I lost quite a bit of principal. I still thought it was due to my own reasons plus the strategy not being precise enough, so I decided to pay 2399 USDT (about 17500 yuan) to join her precision strategy member group, mainly for the following two rights:

1. Get more precise trading points.

2. One-click following function

However, after joining the membership, I immediately found problem one: first, after paying, I asked about the operation process of following trades, and found out that following trades can only be done on DEEPCION, which is extremely risky!

Sister San requires members to follow trades on DEEPCION, and provided a separate download link. However, this platform cannot be found in the Apple Store. When I discovered something was wrong, I searched on Google, Xiaohongshu, etc., and found a lot of posts about DEEPCION being unable to withdraw funds, maliciously manipulating prices (spikes), eating client losses and transaction fees, and various types of warning posts.

As a so-called well-known cryptocurrency blogger, why does she not choose mainstream platforms like Binance or OKEx, but instead let us follow trades on a platform with extremely poor reputation? The reason can be judged for oneself. Therefore, I gave up on following trades and decided to only observe for a period of time according to the operations of the precision strategy group.

After nearly half a month of following trades, I found that

Problem two: Entry prices are always divergent from market prices, profits are always exaggerated, and losses are covered up.

Sister San always provides entry prices that are far from the market price at that time (for going long: the provided entry price is much lower than the market price at that time, for going short: the entry price must be higher than the market price at that time). For example:

• On March 27 at 21:25, Sister San announced a short strategy for ETH in the strategy group, with an entry point 'near 2010' (remember this 'nearby' term), while the market price at that time was: opening 2004 / highest 2005 / lowest 2001 / closing 2002.

• This means no one can enter at 2010, they can only enter at points lower than 2005, there is simply not that much profit, and it may even result in losses.

• If the strategy is profitable (for example, the price drops to 2000): she will shout, '2010→2000 profit of 10 points', and boast about the members' profit screenshots in the group. In fact, most people can only enter below 2005 at most, and the real profit is less than 5 points, and if someone enters at 200, they may even incur losses.

• If the strategy incurs a loss (like the price rises to 2015 for stop loss): she will downplay it, saying 'a small loss of 5 points is okay, we will earn it back next time', while the actual real loss is far more than 5 points.

Sister San cleverly uses the term 'nearby', for example, the entry price 'near 2010' and '201x-200x', let everyone feel it. I previously asked about what counts as 'nearby' for this entry price. Sometimes it fluctuates up and down by 1-3 points, sometimes 1-5 points. So this 'nearby' is very deliberate. She might also throw the blame on the members: 'If you missed the point, then you shouldn't enter.'

Problem three: False marketing in public groups, the actual trading profit situation in member groups is seriously exaggerated.

In the public strategy group, Sister San frequently posts screenshots of profits from the member group.

• The number of profitable trades is indeed greater than losses, but each profit is basically taken in batches, and the set profit points are never fully triggered, far less than what she claims; while losses usually trigger the stop loss price, leading to significant losses. After several small profits, similar messages like 'no matter how much each time you earn, as long as you are in profit, it's very good, it's safer to pocket it' were posted in the strategy group, which contradicts the video she made about profit-loss ratios and win rates.

2. Once profitable, the members have to send the profit screenshots to her, after screening she will show them off; when the strategy incurs losses, Sister San always downplays it, then sends some unrelated information to divert attention to brainwash the members.

What prompted me to privately message Sister San to express dissatisfaction was not simply the occurrence of losses, but also several large losses that had occurred before this, especially on the morning of the 26th when she instructed to short ETH in the member group and incurred losses, and in the afternoon she told us to switch to going long directly, triggering stop loss. On the morning of the 27th, she provided a long entry for BTC in the public group, both long strategies for ETH in the member group incurred significant losses, and in the afternoon, she instructed to short ETH in the member group. Later, I realized something was wrong and advised members to exit near the cost price and not hold overnight, but in fact, this trade incurred another loss because the price never returned to a non-loss position. That is five consecutive defeats, and Sister San completely disregarded the continuous large losses of the members, completely ignoring the members' feelings. As always, she downplayed the situation and avoided the critical issues, treating the members like brainless fools. I mentioned that the last ETH short on the 27th still incurred a loss, and she countered by asking how could it be a loss if we exited near the cost price? Again with the 'nearby'. The implication is that if there is a loss, it is the member's operational problem, her ability to shift blame is truly strong.

I privately messaged Sister San to express a few points.

1. The strategies provided, after being published, the market price has never reached that entry price, and it is often already far off.

2. There have been 5 consecutive strategy losses for 2 days.

3. The screenshots of profits you send in the group each time, in fact, we did not make that much profit at all.

Sister San replied

1. Price fluctuations are normal (price fluctuations are normal, but every time Sister San gives a lower entry price for going long, and a higher entry price for going short, that is TMD not normal)

2. It is normal to have losses in trading, if you cannot accept it, then do not follow' (Of course losses are normal, but it is not normal when it is far from the profit-loss ratio you boast about) 3. Public group sending screenshots of profits to exaggerate profits is a marketing need, if you cannot accept it, then I have nothing to say.' (I understand, but it is disgusting to see the persona being created in the group every day)

Then Sister San also said, 'Do not question me, otherwise refuse to communicate' (You have paid the membership fee, and there is no hope for me to renew it later, that’s up to you), what is most infuriating is that Sister San, without consulting me, directly kicked me out of the member group on the grounds of 'imbalanced mindset, not suitable to continue following', and cleared all chat records in private chat on Telegram and blocked me, trying to erase her unfavorable evidence for her argument.

Her dismissive attitude and logic are: 'This is my territory, I am in charge, what qualification do the newbies who pay to enter the group have to express dissent or dissatisfaction. If you are not satisfied, then get out of the paid membership group', she can kick you out of the group without needing your consent.

I expressed my dissatisfaction to Sister San, hoping that in the future, the entry price for the strategies could be more reliable, and not so sly. Then I told her to think clearly before providing strategies because there are so many members unconditionally trusting you. Do not treat other people's money as if it has no value. I never thought of, nor mentioned, wanting her to bear my losses. Everyone knows there are risks in trading, and since I chose to follow, I am responsible for my own losses. All I wanted was just an attitude.

The above is all my personal paid experience, absolutely no exaggeration. Because the member group is muted, I believe there are many people who dare to be angry but do not dare to speak out. I hope friends who have similar feelings and experiences will connect.