Based on existing information and EU policy trends, the regulatory and development landscape in the cryptocurrency sector may present the following trend predictions in April 2025:

1. Acceleration of cryptocurrency regulatory policy coordination, further refinement of framework details.

• European senior officials will hold talks in April, focusing on the priority directions for digital finance and crypto asset regulation over the next five years.

• MiCA regulation enforcement patches: As MiCA regulations take effect by the end of 2024, supplementary rules may be introduced in April regarding cross-border services and qualifications for stablecoin issuers to alleviate confusion during the market adaptation period.

• Strengthening anti-money laundering and consumer protection: The EU may promote the unification of real-name standards for crypto transactions among member states and enhance tracking capabilities for decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms.

2. Acceleration of the digital euro initiative, intensifying competition with private stablecoins.

• The digital euro, originally planned for launch in November 2025, may enter the pilot phase earlier, with April meetings possibly announcing progress in technical testing and public participation plans.

• Clarification of policy direction: To weaken the dominance of dollar-pegged stablecoins (such as USDT, USDC), the EU may introduce incentive measures to encourage businesses to use the digital euro as a cross-border settlement tool.

• Regulatory game upgrade: Private stablecoin issuers may face stricter reserve audit requirements and may even be restricted in their market share within the EU.

3. Controversy over PoW mechanisms continues, with local restrictive policies diverging.

• Although the EU level vetoed a comprehensive ban on Bitcoin mining, it may allow member states to formulate differentiated policies based on their own energy structures in April.

• Increased restrictions in high-energy-consuming regions: Countries rich in renewable energy, such as those in Northern Europe, may relax mining restrictions, while member states relying on fossil fuels (such as Poland) may raise taxes or energy efficiency thresholds.

• Rising compliance costs for businesses: Institutions providing PoW cryptocurrency services must prove their compliance with EU sustainable finance standards, or they may be prohibited from operating.

4. Increased participation thresholds for institutions, risk isolation measures implemented.

• Management of crypto exposure by financial institutions: Following the requirement for insurance companies to fully cover crypto asset risks, this may extend in April to pension funds, hedge funds, and other institutions to curb speculative investments.

• Tightening of custody and trading service licenses: Exchanges and wallet service providers that do not complete MiCA compliance transformation by the end of April may face business suspension or hefty fines.

5. Support for green crypto technology and mandatory carbon footprint tracking.

• Sustainable finance linkage: The EU may include cryptocurrency projects in the scope of support for 'green bonds', prioritizing blockchain applications that adopt Proof of Stake (PoS) or low-carbon technologies.

• Carbon emission disclosure requirements: Large mining companies and trading platforms may need to submit quarterly carbon footprint reports starting in April, paving the way for subsequent carbon tax policies.

Potential risks and market impacts.

• Increased short-term volatility: Policy uncertainty may lead to regional sell-offs in the crypto market in April, especially affecting small stablecoins and PoW tokens reliant on the EU market.

• Compliance projects benefit: Compliant exchanges that meet MiCA standards (such as Coinbase EU) and green blockchain projects (such as Algorand) may receive capital inflows.

• Conflict between innovation and regulation: DeFi and privacy coins may face stricter scrutiny, with some projects potentially relocating outside the EU to avoid restrictions.

The above predictions are based on the current policy logic of the EU and the agenda for April; actual trends should be monitored through official statements and legislative dynamics of member states after the talks.