I agree with the title you wrote, but it lacks the latter half. The gamification of capital is not specifically described. I don't know if this was written by AI or handwritten. If it was written by AI, I believe your prompt was also thought out to some extent. If you could elaborate on the latter half, I think it would be more meaningful.

GameFi is essentially a product of a compromise between capital and gaming.
The core value of traditional games lies in 'fun', 'experience', and 'artistry'; while financial systems pursue 'returns', 'liquidity', and 'arbitrage opportunities'.
When the two combine, theoretically it can create a synergistic effect of 'earning while playing' (Play-to-Earn). However, in reality, what we often see is a cycle of 'crashing while playing' (Play-to-Dump).
Because capital has never cared about gaming experience, and game developers rarely genuinely focus on capital efficiency. The two parties superficially cooperate but actually exploit each other.