The launch of The Open Network (TON) token, once heralded as a transformative force in the cryptocurrency landscape, has regrettably devolved into a breeding ground for fraudulent schemes, reminiscent of the notorious Solana memecoin scams. Initially envisioned to revolutionize mainstream interaction with digital currencies, TON’s ecosystem has been marred by a proliferation of deceptive airdrop projects, exploiting the community’s trust and enthusiasm.

The Rise and Fall of TON’s Promise

TON, originally developed by Telegram’s founders, Pavel and Nikolai Durov, aimed to integrate seamlessly with the messaging platform, offering users a decentralized layer-1 blockchain experience. This integration was expected to simplify cryptocurrency adoption for the average user, leveraging Telegram’s extensive user base. However, the project faced significant legal challenges. In October 2019, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a temporary restraining order to halt the distribution of Grams (TON’s native tokens), citing unregistered securities offerings. This legal battle culminated in Telegram ceasing active involvement with TON in May 2020, leading to the project’s continuation under the TON Foundation.

The Proliferation of Airdrop Scams

With the transition of TON’s stewardship, the ecosystem became susceptible to malicious actors. Airdrop scams, promising substantial token rewards, have become rampant. These schemes often require participants to make upfront payments or divulge sensitive information, only to receive worthless tokens or none at all. The ‘TON Station Airdrop Scam’ is a notable example, where victims were lured with the promise of receiving between 500 to 60,000 TON tokens, leading to significant financial losses.

From Notcoin to Blum

Projects like Blum have exacerbated the community’s disillusionment. Initially marketed as a decentralized finance (DeFi) revolution, Blum has continually delayed its Token Generation Event (TGE), all while introducing paid features that require users to mint low-value tokens to earn airdrop points for a token whose release remains uncertain. This strategy has been perceived as a blatant cash grab, exploiting users’ hopes for future gains.

Conversely, Notcoin, one of the early tap-to-earn games on TON, managed to deliver on its promises, providing users with tangible rewards without demanding payments. However, subsequent projects have adopted exploitative practices, charging exorbitant fees for participation with little to no return on investment.

Telegram’s Shift to TON Exclusivity

In a move to consolidate its blockchain endeavors, Telegram announced an exclusivity agreement designating TON as the sole blockchain framework for its ecosystem. This mandate requires all mini-apps and cryptocurrency-enabled games within Telegram to transition exclusively to the TON blockchain by February 21, 2025. While this aims to standardize the user experience and enhance security, it has led to the abrupt discontinuation of mini-apps integrated with other blockchains, such as Solana, Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Aptos, and Sui. For instance, the PAWS 🐾 mini-app, which previously supported multiple chains, was compelled to migrate entirely to Solana, disrupting its user base and operations.

The Exodus of Developers and Users

Telegram’s stringent policy has alienated developers and users who favored alternative blockchains. The forced migration to TON has been met with resistance, as many perceive TON’s ecosystem to be rife with scams and unreliable projects. This sentiment has driven users towards platforms like Phantom, a Solana-based wallet, which has seen a surge in downloads and now ranks prominently among decentralized applications (DApps).

What is next? The Uncertain Future of TON

TON’s trajectory from a promising blockchain initiative to a hotbed of fraudulent activities serves as a cautionary tale in the cryptocurrency realm. The proliferation of scam projects, coupled with Telegram’s enforced exclusivity, has eroded trust and stifled innovation within the ecosystem. As users and developers seek more secure and versatile platforms, TON faces the daunting challenge of redeeming its reputation and delivering on its original promise of revolutionizing mainstream cryptocurrency adoption.

In the words of renowned investor Warren Buffett, “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it.” TON’s journey underscores the imperative for transparency, security, and community engagement in the ever-evolving landscape of digital finance.

What are your thoughts about the network ecosystem and projects held built in mini apps and airdrops with these new policies of restriction to other chains, going counter the current trend of interoperability between chains solutions seeking?

Share your opinion and if you use #TON #Telegram or believe it was just a moment hype?

Warm virtual hugs

Dr F.