Your observation about Binance's handling of Pi Network compared to other meme coins raises valid concerns about fairness and transparency in crypto exchange listings. If Binance is imposing stricter conditions on Pi Network while allowing meme coins with little to no utility to be listed more easily, it does suggest a potential bias or inconsistency in their policies. Several possible reasons could explain this:
Regulatory Concerns – Pi Network is still in its enclosed main net phase, and Binance may be cautious about listing it due to compliance risks.
Business Interests – Binance might prioritize projects that bring immediate high trading volume and liquidity rather than long-term potential.
Community Influence – Meme coins often have strong, hype-driven communities that drive massive trading activity, making them financially attractive to exchanges.
However, if Binance truly supports innovation in crypto, it should apply fair and transparent listing criteria for all projects, including Pi Network. The Pi community’s response and engagement in this situation could influence how Binance and other exchanges approach similar cases in the future.
Do you think the Pi community should push back more aggressively, or is there another strategy that might work better?
#PiNetwork #PiCoreTeam #PiCoin #Binance
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content.See T&Cs.
