$RED

Last night, RedStone opened the airdrop for claims, but within ten minutes, the community erupted, with waves of denunciations, echoing from the Chinese community to the English community.

Counting the key phrases, the most common keyword in the community was "scam," and the most frequent demand was "CZ and Binance should immediately delist this scam project."

What exactly did Redstone do to provoke such a strong reaction from the community? The focus is on the following three points:

1. Rule Fraud. During the years of project development, many users completed hundreds of tasks, including various special tasks during holidays, while continuously hinting to users that performing tasks would earn points and lead to future airdrops. However, in the end, when the airdrop rules were provided, a so-called "special role" suddenly emerged, which was required to qualify, with no prior indication.

2. Excessive insider trading. According to community feedback, it is roughly estimated that over 98% are not eligible for the airdrop, while many dedicated community members participated in every task and activity.

3. Promises significantly reduced. Previously, the project team claimed that 10% would be given to the community, but the current estimate is less than 2%. According to incomplete statistics, only 4,000 addresses received the airdrop.

When did Binance's selective process turn into a scam selection?