Your observation about Binance's treatment of Pi Network in comparison to other meme coins raises valid concerns about fairness and transparency in crypto exchange listings. If Binance is imposing stricter requirements on Pi Network while allowing meme coins with little to no utility to be listed more easily, it does suggest a potential bias or inconsistency in their policies.
Several factors could explain this:
1. Regulatory Concerns – Pi Network is still in its enclosed mainnet phase, and Binance may be cautious about listing it due to potential compliance risks.
2. Business Interests – Binance might prioritize projects that generate immediate high trading volume and liquidity, rather than focusing on long-term potential.
3. Community Influence – Meme coins often have strong, hype-driven communities that fuel massive trading activity, making them financially appealing to exchanges.
That said, if Binance is genuinely committed to supporting innovation in crypto, it should apply consistent and transparent listing criteria for all projects, including Pi Network. The response and engagement from the Pi community could influence how Binance and other exchanges approach similar situations in the future.
Do you think the Pi community should take a more aggressive stance, or is there a different strategy that might be more effective?